M5POST
BMW Garage BMW Meets Register Today's Posts

Go Back   M5POST - BMW M5 Forum > F10 M5 Forum > M5 versus...

Post Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
      08-22-2016, 02:44 PM   #1
cjrdriven
Second Lieutenant
United_States
63
Rep
222
Posts

Drives: 2014 BMW M5
Join Date: May 2015
Location: TN

iTrader: (0)

Comp Package M5 vs Standard M5 with MSR intakes 40-160

Both same year and Black M5 standard with MSR intakes and White Comp Package with carbon filter delete. Enjoy MSR fans!

Appreciate 0
      08-22-2016, 03:38 PM   #2
Badboy8813
Second Lieutenant
Badboy8813's Avatar
46
Rep
217
Posts

Drives: F06 Frozen SS 2014 M6 CP
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Nashville

iTrader: (2)

That was my white CP in the video. We actually switched cars and the results were the same. Interesting outcome indeed!
__________________
'14 F10 CP M5 AW/Full Sakhir Orange, Gloss Black 343Ms, Black IND Cosmetic Package, M Performance CF Diffuser and Spoiler. - SOLD
Appreciate 0
      08-22-2016, 06:52 PM   #3
Vic55
Lieutenant General
Vic55's Avatar
19550
Rep
10,190
Posts

Drives: 2023 BMW M8 Competition Coupe
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: THE Orange County

iTrader: (9)

intake for the win thru the usable rpms... the comp pack only gives the white car a small bump at the highest of rpms over the black car (zcp vs no zcp)
__________________
2024 BMW M3 CS Frozen Solid White
2023 BMW M8 Coupe Competition Alpine White
2022 Porsche Carrera GTS Coupe Shark Blue
2020 Audi R8 V10 Performance Suzuka Gray
2012 Mercedes Benz C63 AMG Black Series Obsidian Black
Appreciate 0
      08-22-2016, 09:10 PM   #4
David 12
Major
David 12's Avatar
129
Rep
1,048
Posts

Drives: 2019 BMW X5 50i BSM, M Sport
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Omaha

iTrader: (0)

And props for switching drivers to control as many variables as possible

Dave
Appreciate 0
      08-22-2016, 09:24 PM   #5
TrevorM3
Banned
3323
Rep
8,083
Posts

Drives: 6.3 AMG
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: Florida

iTrader: (0)

wow, that is interesting..
Appreciate 0
      08-22-2016, 09:50 PM   #6
13M5F10
Hide! My wife's coming!
13M5F10's Avatar
United_States
813
Rep
2,816
Posts

Drives: 2013 BMW M5 | MSR Stage 3
Join Date: Jun 2015
Location: Las Colinas, TX

iTrader: (5)

Love it!! Let's see what trolls come out. Bahahahaha
__________________
*** SOLD *** 2013 BMW M5 | Space Grey | MSR Stage 3 Tune | Catless Downpipes | MSR Intake and Charge Pipes | MSR Exhaust (Prototype) | Vorsteiner Rear Diffuser | RW Carbon Front Lip | RW Carbon Trunk Spoiler| Vorsteiner VS-310 Forged Wheels | Escort 9500CI w/Laser Jammers
Appreciate 0
      08-23-2016, 09:28 AM   #7
DaveCM5
Second Lieutenant
85
Rep
252
Posts

Drives: 2014 M5 Sapphire Black
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Florida

iTrader: (0)

Not trolling as I think the difference between a comp pack car and standard is negligible, but the way the black car pulled away it looked like a 50-100hp difference. Do you think the intakes added 50-100 hp?

Or maybe the white car isn't running very well, or the black car is running better than advertised?

It would be interesting to run them side by side without any modifications for a baseline.
Appreciate 0
      08-23-2016, 10:34 AM   #8
HXS
Licensed Drug Dealer
HXS's Avatar
United_States
742
Rep
2,271
Posts

Drives: F10 M5
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: SoCal

iTrader: (7)

Is there a tune on the one with the MSR intakes?
Appreciate 0
      08-23-2016, 11:26 AM   #9
wujekwaldus
Private First Class
wujekwaldus's Avatar
Poland
118
Rep
126
Posts

Drives: 458,Huracan Spyder,G500
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Warsaw

iTrader: (0)

I have raced my M6 CP (575) with M6 '15 Non CP.
Both stock, both got passanger both have even the same equipment (CCB, full individual)



same M6 '15 Non CP vs M4 with ecu and exhaust (i was recording only - not racing):


So there must be something wrong with Black CP M5....
Appreciate 0
      08-23-2016, 12:08 PM   #10
cjrdriven
Second Lieutenant
United_States
63
Rep
222
Posts

Drives: 2014 BMW M5
Join Date: May 2015
Location: TN

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by wujekwaldus View Post
I have raced my M6 CP (575) with M6 '15 Non CP.
Both stock, both got passanger both have even the same equipment (CCB, full individual)



same M6 '15 Non CP vs M4 with ecu and exhaust (i was recording only - not racing):


So there must be something wrong with Black CP M5....
Trying to follow your point. The Black M5 was non comp package in my vid and was the one pulling out front.
Appreciate 0
      08-23-2016, 12:10 PM   #11
cjrdriven
Second Lieutenant
United_States
63
Rep
222
Posts

Drives: 2014 BMW M5
Join Date: May 2015
Location: TN

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by HXS View Post
Is there a tune on the one with the MSR intakes?
Stock engine and tune with no piggy back currently. Only power mod is MSR intakes.
Appreciate 0
      08-23-2016, 02:37 PM   #12
m6beast
Captain
m6beast's Avatar
185
Rep
792
Posts

Drives: stock m6
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: nc

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by DaveCM5 View Post
Not trolling as I think the difference between a comp pack car and standard is negligible, but the way the black car pulled away it looked like a 50-100hp difference. Do you think the intakes added 50-100 hp?

Or maybe the white car isn't running very well, or the black car is running better than advertised?

It would be interesting to run them side by side without any modifications for a baseline.
The intake is an unconventional design of compressed air and takes two weeks to fully adapt. The only intake in the industry that will give you a cel of too much air codes or missfire codes in the upper gears if you rush adaptation.

Vbox 60-130 mph on stock non comp M5 knocked off .5 seconds.

Also at the track with intake only ran 12.0 119 mph consistently and a best of 11.9 119mph with 2.0 60ft while racing against another non comp m5 that had jb3 3.5lbs boost, BMS filters carbon filter delete rpi scoops and muffler delete that was runing 12.1-12.2 120 mph and a best 12.0 120 mph same 2.0 60ft

After that race installed intake on a Friday went to the track that following wed and ran 11.7@ 121mph and not fully adapted, then went back a week later to the track and ran 11.5-11.6 @124-125 mph no other changes other then adaptation.

Have all the data for those who want to see it, Dyno, drag slips ect. The jb3 car was pushing 630whp on the Dyno and the stock m5 was only pushing 590whp showing the intake Doesn't show its true potential on the Dyno do to compressed air like on the street. So you can see an additional 50+ whp on the street compared to Dyno numbers.

As for my M6 the best I could do before intake was 11.2 @ 125-126 after intake 11.0 @127-128 traction became I'm issue even with my r888 285 30 20. After I swapped to 315 30 20 broke into the 10's and best 10.7 @ 129 mph, still hold record for stock turbos.

The intake makes more power proven between stock car before and after of 20-30whp gain in the midrange and on the fully Moded M6 with less restrictions 30-40whp through the midrange. All this is documented if any one wants to see the data.

Hope this shows some light to actual tested gains
Appreciate 0
      08-23-2016, 07:21 PM   #13
TrevorM3
Banned
3323
Rep
8,083
Posts

Drives: 6.3 AMG
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: Florida

iTrader: (0)

i have a comp pack car, i'd really like to see how it does against a bone stock car.. that comp pack m6 pulled very hard on the m5.. hmmmmm
Appreciate 0
      08-23-2016, 10:36 PM   #14
Vic55
Lieutenant General
Vic55's Avatar
19550
Rep
10,190
Posts

Drives: 2023 BMW M8 Competition Coupe
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: THE Orange County

iTrader: (9)

The M4 didn't fare too bad either LOL- of course less weight and probably a good hp and tq curve doesn't hurt with that tune.
__________________
2024 BMW M3 CS Frozen Solid White
2023 BMW M8 Coupe Competition Alpine White
2022 Porsche Carrera GTS Coupe Shark Blue
2020 Audi R8 V10 Performance Suzuka Gray
2012 Mercedes Benz C63 AMG Black Series Obsidian Black
Appreciate 0
      08-23-2016, 10:41 PM   #15
m6beast
Captain
m6beast's Avatar
185
Rep
792
Posts

Drives: stock m6
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: nc

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by Vic55 View Post
The M4 didn't fare too bad either LOL- of course less weight and probably a good hp and tq curve doesn't hurt with that tune.
Here's a little video of M4 before and after MSR intake against fully Moded F10 M5



Enjoy the video
Appreciate 0
      08-24-2016, 08:50 AM   #16
Vic55
Lieutenant General
Vic55's Avatar
19550
Rep
10,190
Posts

Drives: 2023 BMW M8 Competition Coupe
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: THE Orange County

iTrader: (9)

Quote:
Originally Posted by m6beast View Post
Here's a little video of M4 before and after MSR intake against fully Moded F10 M5

Enjoy the video
OK OK Ill bite, where do I get this installed in So Cal?
__________________
2024 BMW M3 CS Frozen Solid White
2023 BMW M8 Coupe Competition Alpine White
2022 Porsche Carrera GTS Coupe Shark Blue
2020 Audi R8 V10 Performance Suzuka Gray
2012 Mercedes Benz C63 AMG Black Series Obsidian Black
Appreciate 0
      08-24-2016, 09:33 AM   #17
m6beast
Captain
m6beast's Avatar
185
Rep
792
Posts

Drives: stock m6
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: nc

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by Vic55 View Post
OK OK Ill bite, where do I get this installed in So Cal?
Send an email to info@mstreetracing.com for details take care!
Appreciate 0
      08-24-2016, 03:34 PM   #18
DaveCM5
Second Lieutenant
85
Rep
252
Posts

Drives: 2014 M5 Sapphire Black
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Florida

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by m6beast View Post
The intake is an unconventional design of compressed air and takes two weeks to fully adapt. The only intake in the industry that will give you a cel of too much air codes or missfire codes in the upper gears if you rush adaptation.

Vbox 60-130 mph on stock non comp M5 knocked off .5 seconds.

Also at the track with intake only ran 12.0 119 mph consistently and a best of 11.9 119mph with 2.0 60ft while racing against another non comp m5 that had jb3 3.5lbs boost, BMS filters carbon filter delete rpi scoops and muffler delete that was runing 12.1-12.2 120 mph and a best 12.0 120 mph same 2.0 60ft

After that race installed intake on a Friday went to the track that following wed and ran 11.7@ 121mph and not fully adapted, then went back a week later to the track and ran 11.5-11.6 @124-125 mph no other changes other then adaptation.

Have all the data for those who want to see it, Dyno, drag slips ect. The jb3 car was pushing 630whp on the Dyno and the stock m5 was only pushing 590whp showing the intake Doesn't show its true potential on the Dyno do to compressed air like on the street. So you can see an additional 50+ whp on the street compared to Dyno numbers.

As for my M6 the best I could do before intake was 11.2 @ 125-126 after intake 11.0 @127-128 traction became I'm issue even with my r888 285 30 20. After I swapped to 315 30 20 broke into the 10's and best 10.7 @ 129 mph, still hold record for stock turbos.

The intake makes more power proven between stock car before and after of 20-30whp gain in the midrange and on the fully Moded M6 with less restrictions 30-40whp through the midrange. All this is documented if any one wants to see the data.

Hope this shows some light to actual tested gains
So it's basically like a mild shot of nitrous? But instead of using nitrous oxide you're just using regular atmosphere compressed, so when the air comes out of compression in the intake it's much colder so you get the boost of super cold air, but without the added concentration of oxygen NO2 would give?
Appreciate 0
      08-24-2016, 09:24 PM   #19
TrevorM3
Banned
3323
Rep
8,083
Posts

Drives: 6.3 AMG
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: Florida

iTrader: (0)

dam that m5 got raped... weight is killing us. lol
Appreciate 0
      08-27-2016, 05:53 PM   #20
kevn23
Private First Class
30
Rep
105
Posts

Drives: -
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: SoCal

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by cjrdriven View Post
Both same year and Black M5 standard with MSR intakes and White Comp Package with carbon filter delete. Enjoy MSR fans!

Did you guys do a comparo when both cars were stock?
Appreciate 0
      09-22-2016, 09:15 AM   #21
cjrdriven
Second Lieutenant
United_States
63
Rep
222
Posts

Drives: 2014 BMW M5
Join Date: May 2015
Location: TN

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by lunden View Post
Nice, but what year are both cars? If the comp package is after 2014/07 it's actually only doing 490-505whp on dyno. Those PRE 2014/07 are monsters on dyno Around 530-550whp on stock cars. Hence you have this gap.
Both 2014s. I will get build dates but both also on latest firmware.
Appreciate 0
      09-22-2016, 05:49 PM   #22
cjrdriven
Second Lieutenant
United_States
63
Rep
222
Posts

Drives: 2014 BMW M5
Join Date: May 2015
Location: TN

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by lunden View Post
Depends what month! It really is slow after 2014/07 .. slower than pre.
Hardware or software that made difference?
Appreciate 0
Post Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:20 PM.




m5post
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
1Addicts.com, BIMMERPOST.com, E90Post.com, F30Post.com, M3Post.com, ZPost.com, 5Post.com, 6Post.com, 7Post.com, XBimmers.com logo and trademark are properties of BIMMERPOST