ESS 650 Dyno Results

JABSprings · 06-05-2015, 12:33 PM

Recent dyno results for the forum's reviewing pleasure...

585 WHP / 388 TQ

2011 E92
ESS 650 Kit
ESS Tune
AA Signature X Pipe / HFC
Eisenmann Sport Exhaust
100 Octane

Note that the kit is good up to 8psi... Only putting out 6.78PSI at altitude.

whats77inaname · 06-05-2015, 12:48 PM

Since I'm not in the habit of opening PDFs from people I don't know (nothing personal)....585hp or 585whp?

JABSprings · 06-05-2015, 01:03 PM

WHP... Corrected now in my original posting.

pbonsalb · 06-05-2015, 01:03 PM

RWHP SAE Dynojet. Great result. It should be corrected for the altitude by the DJ SAE but you are correct the boost would be lower at altitude on a fixed pulley supercharger (as opposed to a turbo that will spin faster to make the boost called for by the wastegate). 585/388 would be entertaining in one of these cars.

whats77inaname · 06-05-2015, 01:07 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JABSprings

WHP... Corrected now in my original posting.

Might want to open the PDF, take a screenshot of it, save it as a .jpg or something and attach it to the first post. People are (or should be) cognizant about the dangers of opening random files from the interwebz.

SPECTACULAR results though. Congratulations, I'm really, really happy for you. How does it feel? Did you keep the stock redline?

e92livin · 06-05-2015, 01:11 PM

strong #s

sales@ESSTuning · 06-05-2015, 02:26 PM

Looks good

pbonsalb · 06-05-2015, 02:45 PM

What do you think it would have done on 91 or 93 pump gas instead of 100 octane race gas?

tom @ eas · 06-05-2015, 02:54 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JABSprings

Recent dyno results for the forum's reviewing pleasure...

585 WHP / 388 TQ

2011 E92
ESS 650 Kit
ESS Tune
AA Signature X Pipe / HFC
Eisenmann Sport Exhaust
100 Octane

Note that the kit is good up to 8psi... Only putting out 6.78PSI at altitude.

Fixed:

Very good numbers, thanks for sharing!

MFL · 06-05-2015, 03:15 PM

SAE 1.28!

Altitude SUCKS!

JABSprings · 06-05-2015, 03:21 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by whats77inaname

SPECTACULAR results though. Congratulations, I'm really, really happy for you. How does it feel? Did you keep the stock redline?

Yes, I kept the stock redline. And the feel.... OMG! Night and day difference from the 625 kit. Thanks for the feedback.

whats77inaname · 06-05-2015, 03:26 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JABSprings

Yes, I kept the stock redline. And the feel.... OMG! Night and day difference from the 625 kit. Thanks for the feedback.

When you were running the 625, were you running 100 octane as well?

JABSprings · 06-05-2015, 03:29 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by whats77inaname

When you were running the 625, were you running 100 octane as well?

No... 91 Octane. Obviously makes some difference. 93 octane is not available in Colorado. The dyno was 100 octane, but I also sometimes run 50/50 split between 100 and 91. Just depends how frequently I'm driving.

Patrón · 06-05-2015, 03:58 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JABSprings

Only putting out 6.78PSI at altitude.

Nice numbers, I'm happy you like it.
What boost were you seeing with the 625 kit?

whats77inaname · 06-05-2015, 04:11 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JABSprings

No... 91 Octane. Obviously makes some difference. 93 octane is not available in Colorado. The dyno was 100 octane, but I also sometimes run 50/50 split between 100 and 91. Just depends how frequently I'm driving.

Yeah, that's what I was alluding to and wanted to determine: if the octane rating changed, hence accounting for the difference. But still....it's always been my opinion that with a properly set up meth kit to cool the intake charge, and a couple other mods, a 650 kit would come damn close to putting down 620whp.

I'm interested in seeing what more you do to the car

8k3 · 06-05-2015, 07:34 PM

Is this the stock pulley that came with the 650 kit? boost seems high for elevation.

Longboarder · 06-05-2015, 09:34 PM

Great numbers!

SAE conversion 1.28 so does that mean it made (uncorrected) 468 hp 303 tq?

jimk · 06-05-2015, 11:02 PM

Awesome numbers. What shop did you take it to for the dyno runs? I'm looking for a shop in the Denver area. Thanks.

06-05-2015, 12:48 PM	#2
whats77inaname Banned 829 Rep 3,387 Posts Drives: when at all possible Join Date: Aug 2011 Location: Tx iTrader: (25)	Since I'm not in the habit of opening PDFs from people I don't know (nothing personal)....585hp or 585whp?
	Appreciate 0 Quote

06-05-2015, 01:03 PM	#3
JABSprings Private 11 Rep 88 Posts Drives: '11 E92 / ESS VT2-650 Join Date: Nov 2012 Location: Colorado Springs iTrader: (0)	WHP... Corrected now in my original posting.
	Appreciate 0 Quote

06-05-2015, 01:03 PM	#4
pbonsalb Lieutenant General 5269 Rep 10,666 Posts Drives: 18 F90 M5, 99 E36 M3 Turbo Join Date: Feb 2011 Location: New England iTrader: (4)	RWHP SAE Dynojet. Great result. It should be corrected for the altitude by the DJ SAE but you are correct the boost would be lower at altitude on a fixed pulley supercharger (as opposed to a turbo that will spin faster to make the boost called for by the wastegate). 585/388 would be entertaining in one of these cars.
	Appreciate 0 Quote

06-05-2015, 01:11 PM	#6
e92livin Major 74 Rep 1,123 Posts Drives: M3 Join Date: Apr 2012 Location: Orlando iTrader: (7)	strong #s __________________ 2008 E92 BMW M3 MR/BB 6MT \|Gintani Supercharged\|Gintani X-Pipe\|Stack Gauges\|Volk TE37SL\|BC Racing Coilovers\|Nitto NT05R \|BMW Performance Spoiler\|BMW Performance Steering Wheel\|BMW Performance Side Gills + Grilles\|Mode Carbon V1 Endurance\|IND Tri- Stitched Shift + Brake Boot - 566WHP, 371WTQ \|
	Appreciate 0 Quote

06-05-2015, 02:26 PM	#7
sales@ESSTuning 391 Rep 3,149 Posts Drives: ESS M3 / M4 Join Date: May 2007 Location: AZ iTrader: (6)	Looks good
	Appreciate 0 Quote

06-05-2015, 02:45 PM	#8
pbonsalb Lieutenant General 5269 Rep 10,666 Posts Drives: 18 F90 M5, 99 E36 M3 Turbo Join Date: Feb 2011 Location: New England iTrader: (4)	What do you think it would have done on 91 or 93 pump gas instead of 100 octane race gas?
	Appreciate 0 Quote

06-05-2015, 03:15 PM	#10
MFL Major 174 Rep 1,246 Posts Drives: E92 M3 Join Date: Sep 2013 Location: Bellevue, WA iTrader: (3) Garage List 2010 BMW M3 [9.00]	SAE 1.28! Altitude SUCKS!
	Appreciate 0 Quote

06-05-2015, 07:34 PM	#16
8k3 Banned 124 Rep 951 Posts Drives: Car Join Date: Feb 2013 Location: Boise, ID iTrader: (1)	Is this the stock pulley that came with the 650 kit? boost seems high for elevation.
	Appreciate 0 Quote

06-05-2015, 09:34 PM	#17
Longboarder Major General 3436 Rep 6,771 Posts Drives: 2016 BMW i8 Join Date: Dec 2006 Location: Monarch Beach iTrader: (1) Garage List 2012 BMW e92 M3 [0.00] 2021 BMW X5M [10.00] 2015 Porsche 991 Tu ... [10.00] 2015 Porsche 991 GT3 [10.00]	Great numbers! SAE conversion 1.28 so does that mean it made (uncorrected) 468 hp 303 tq? __________________ Current BMWs: 2022 X5 40i, 2016 X5 50i 2015 Porsche 991 Turbo S 1979 Porsche 911 Turbo (930) a couple others IG: longboarder949; YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCT1...eoFBszPIK0gf9w
	Appreciate 0 Quote

06-05-2015, 11:02 PM	#18
jimk Captain 106 Rep 935 Posts Drives: 2018 M550i Join Date: Jun 2009 Location: Camarillo, CA iTrader: (8)	Awesome numbers. What shop did you take it to for the dyno runs? I'm looking for a shop in the Denver area. Thanks.
	Appreciate 0 Quote