[t5pilot]

Originally Posted by Nobby Clark

Rule 128,129

Nope. This is specifically for double whites system.

[4WDriver]

Originally Posted by t5pilot

That was harsh. In those circumstances I'd have elected a day in court for the officer to explain why he/she was not maintaining lane discipline & use their video as defence of their actions.

Yes very harsh, he is young with a M135i and his first offense. Despite our advice he opted for the path of least resistance. Shame but not good for police relations either. I too think he'd have won in court.

[4WDriver]

Originally Posted by 1 AKY

Can you clarify what you mean by Lanes 1 & 6? Which would be nearest to the hard-shoulder (assuming there is one)?

Isn't it quite obvious?

[1 AKY]

Originally Posted by 4WDriver

Isn't it quite obvious?

Hence the use of the word "clarify". In that case, can't believe the BiB has the audacity to give him a FP when they themselves weren't behaving.

Unfortunately not all 5O are the same and in my experience, a lot of non-traffic officers lack common-sense and are not au-fait with the Highway Code, RT Acts etc.

[Nobby Clark]

[QUOTE=t5pilot;23173118]Nope. This is specifically for double whites system.

.

[t5pilot]

[QUOTE=Nobby Clark;23174419]

Originally Posted by t5pilot

Nope. This is specifically for double whites system.

.

I believe we're at crossed wires.
Double whites include if one of them is broken or not. So 2 Central lines, one of them broken or not.
Yes, if the 1st line is solid (the one next to you) then of course you can't cross or straddle it.
The way I read your post was if there was just one, single solid line, dividing the opposing traffic. My point being this does not exist.
We got there in the end