Procede V2 Dyno Link

leftcoastman · 10-16-2007, 11:09 AM

To help cut through the haze of Xede vs. Procede vs. ****** vs. ResistorCede, etc that is in the other post and hone in on what people are really looking for: Production V2 dynos...

http://www.e90post.com/forums/showth...46#post1542946

PresaMat · 10-16-2007, 11:41 AM

VERY NICE! Where are you located? Is that on 91 or 93 octane? Thanks for finally posting some dynos to shut everyone up.

Mr. 5 · 10-16-2007, 11:44 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by PresaMat

VERY NICE! Where are you located? Is that on 91 or 93 octane? Thanks for finally posting some dynos to shut everyone up.

Good question. What octane?
Aslo, what exactly changed between the 2 runs? What was the boost set at?

Dascamel · 10-16-2007, 11:46 AM

Lefty, any other mods on your car? I'm hoping your completely stock for a nice baseline.

PresaMat · 10-16-2007, 11:48 AM

Mr5 he changed the boost settings in the procede between the runs... talks bout it in his post.

Mr. 5 · 10-16-2007, 11:54 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by PresaMat

Mr5 he changed the boost settings in the procede between the runs... talks bout it in his post.

I know. That's why I asked what he did exactly. What settings did he change it from and what did he change it to? What percentage?

leftcoastman · 10-16-2007, 12:07 PM

93 octane, went from 100 % across the board to:

94% at 3000, 94% at 3500 and 96% at 4000 to help smooth out the torque rush in the midrange. Keep in mind I'm going for smoothness for the road course. Unintended side effect is that that HP was higher.

About other mods, not to be an ass, but do people not read my post? I've received multiple PMs on it and there have been a few replies asking about it.

sflgator · 10-16-2007, 12:08 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dascamel

Lefty, any other mods on your car? I'm hoping your completely stock for a nice baseline.

He's got DPs as well.

zenmaster · 10-16-2007, 12:12 PM

Thanks for posting this. Even with downpipes, that's still 10-15whp over v1x. Not bad.

What was air temp?

remydlc · 10-16-2007, 12:16 PM

Amazing #'s

V2 FTW

PresaMat · 10-16-2007, 12:39 PM

I wonder why less torque would increase the HP?

leftcoastman · 10-16-2007, 12:47 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by PresaMat

I wonder why less torque would increase the HP?

Shiv called me about it this morning. Basically you have a fixed time interval and if you spin the crap out of the turbos down low, you preheat them.

By the time you get to the top end of the same high torque run, the turbos are pumping out hotter air, hence less HP.

But I ain't no enginEAR, but that's the word from the man. Makes sense to me.

CanadianTSi · 10-16-2007, 12:50 PM

If you look at the Graph, when torque was down Horsepower was also down, which makes sense...

Power just happened to peak a little higher, its still basically the same from 5K on.

Sniz · 10-16-2007, 12:54 PM

Looks like the dyno w/ 100% across the board is actually smoother...no?

leftcoastman · 10-16-2007, 12:58 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sniz

Looks like the dyno w/ 100% across the board is actually smoother...no?

You're right. My analysis of low/high power settings is not conclusive.

sflgator · 10-16-2007, 01:19 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by leftcoastman

You're right. My analysis of low/high power settings is not conclusive.

Back to the drawing board for a flat, smooth TQ curve.

sflgator · 10-16-2007, 01:23 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by zenmaster

Thanks for posting this. Even with downpipes, that's still 10-15whp over v1x. Not bad.

What was air temp?

Actually, without knowing what his PROcede v1.4x dyno was (assuming it was approx. 325WHP w/ v1.47...which is about average), I'd say that's about +40WHP (+/-5WHP) w/ just v2 (taking into account ~ +15WHP for the DPs)!!!!

Driver72 · 10-16-2007, 01:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by leftcoastman

93 octane, went from 100 % across the board to:

94% at 3000, 94% at 3500 and 96% at 4000 to help smooth out the torque rush in the midrange. Keep in mind I'm going for smoothness for the road course. Unintended side effect is that that HP was higher.

So you went from:
100% 1000-2500 rpms
94% from 3000-3500 rpms
96% at 4000 rpms
100% from 4500-7000 rpms

Is that correct?

If so, why did you choose to have full power down low, then drop power in the middle and then full power back up top?

Driver72 · 10-16-2007, 01:29 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by sflgator

Actually, without knowing what his PROcede v1.4x dyno was (assuming it was approx. 325WHP w/ v1.47...which is about average), I'd say that's about +40WHP (+/-5WHP) w/ just v2 (taking into account ~ +15-20WHP for the DPs)!!!!

I think most manual 93 Octane v1.47 cars were more like 330+ rwhp.

On my sedan, with an auto, when I did a 93 Octane run, I got 325 rwhp. And the manuals are usually 5-8 rwhp more.

I agree though, I'd say the v2.0 gave him roughly 30+ rwhp alone (if one feels the high cat DP's are good for 10-12 rwhp).

sflgator · 10-16-2007, 01:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Driver72

I think most manual 93 Octane v1.47 cars were more like 330+ rwhp.

On my sedan, with an auto, when I did a 93 Octane run, I got 325 rwhp. And the manuals are usually 5-8 rwhp more.

I agree though, I'd say the v2.0 gave him roughly 30+ rwhp alone (if one feels the high cat DP's are good for 10-12 rwhp).

Like all of us lucky PROcede v2 335i drivers said...v2 is definitely more powerful by ~ +30WHP or higher!!!!

Damn nay-sayers.

leftcoastman · 10-16-2007, 01:36 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Driver72

So you went from:
100% 1000-2500 rpms
94% from 3000-3500 rpms
96% at 4000 rpms
100% from 4500-7000 rpms

Is that correct?

If so, why did you choose to have full power down low, then drop power in the middle and then full power back up top?

To flatten out the torque curve hump at 3-4k. Remember, I want as flat as possible for road course use. Getting a 400+ftlb hit at 3000rpm while in a corner, at the limit, can mean a visit to the weeds.

BMW_TT · 10-16-2007, 01:58 PM

is that on a stock 335i? sorry if it was covered.

10-16-2007, 11:09 AM	#1
leftcoastman Lieutenant Colonel 52 Rep 1,714 Posts Drives: 335i Join Date: Jan 2007 Location: Near some canyons iTrader: (1)	Procede V2 Dyno Link To help cut through the haze of Xede vs. Procede vs. ****** vs. ResistorCede, etc that is in the other post and hone in on what people are really looking for: Production V2 dynos... http://www.e90post.com/forums/showth...46#post1542946
	Appreciate 0 Tweet Quote

10-16-2007, 11:41 AM	#2
PresaMat Major 35 Rep 1,169 Posts Drives: 67 GT500,69 Boss 429, 335i Join Date: Sep 2006 Location: Houston,TX iTrader: (0) Garage List 1967 Shelby Mustang ... [0.00]	VERY NICE! Where are you located? Is that on 91 or 93 octane? Thanks for finally posting some dynos to shut everyone up. __________________ -Mat Tuned E92 335, Riss Racing downpipes! And hopefully over 400RWHP!!
	Appreciate 0 Quote

10-16-2007, 11:46 AM	#4
Dascamel Lieutenant Colonel 48 Rep 1,664 Posts Drives: 2008 e92 M3, 2010 e91 328i Join Date: Jul 2007 Location: Bakersfield, CA iTrader: (0)	Lefty, any other mods on your car? I'm hoping your completely stock for a nice baseline. __________________ 2008 E92 M3 Jerez Black,DCT,Fox Red ext,Prem,Tech,19", ipod/usb, CF roof and trim 2010 E91 328i Space Gray,Black int, M sport, most options 2007 Montego Blue 335i (retired)
	Appreciate 0 Quote

10-16-2007, 11:48 AM	#5
PresaMat Major 35 Rep 1,169 Posts Drives: 67 GT500,69 Boss 429, 335i Join Date: Sep 2006 Location: Houston,TX iTrader: (0) Garage List 1967 Shelby Mustang ... [0.00]	Mr5 he changed the boost settings in the procede between the runs... talks bout it in his post. __________________ -Mat Tuned E92 335, Riss Racing downpipes! And hopefully over 400RWHP!!
	Appreciate 0 Quote

10-16-2007, 12:07 PM	#7
leftcoastman Lieutenant Colonel 52 Rep 1,714 Posts Drives: 335i Join Date: Jan 2007 Location: Near some canyons iTrader: (1)	93 octane, went from 100 % across the board to: 94% at 3000, 94% at 3500 and 96% at 4000 to help smooth out the torque rush in the midrange. Keep in mind I'm going for smoothness for the road course. Unintended side effect is that that HP was higher. About other mods, not to be an ass, but do people not read my post? I've received multiple PMs on it and there have been a few replies asking about it.
	Appreciate 0 Quote

10-16-2007, 12:12 PM	#9
zenmaster Brigadier General 1577 Rep 3,888 Posts Drives: '17 M2 Join Date: Mar 2007 Location: Atlanta iTrader: (1)	Thanks for posting this. Even with downpipes, that's still 10-15whp over v1x. Not bad. What was air temp?
	Appreciate 0 Quote

10-16-2007, 12:16 PM	#10
remydlc Captain 23 Rep 617 Posts Drives: F30 N55 MT/blue metal/red int. Join Date: Aug 2007 Location: South Florida iTrader: (0)	Amazing #'s V2 FTW __________________ root@bash-it# shift -g 6 -c 335i \| grep "155 MPH"
	Appreciate 0 Quote

10-16-2007, 12:39 PM	#11
PresaMat Major 35 Rep 1,169 Posts Drives: 67 GT500,69 Boss 429, 335i Join Date: Sep 2006 Location: Houston,TX iTrader: (0) Garage List 1967 Shelby Mustang ... [0.00]	I wonder why less torque would increase the HP? __________________ -Mat Tuned E92 335, Riss Racing downpipes! And hopefully over 400RWHP!!
	Appreciate 0 Quote

10-16-2007, 12:50 PM	#13
CanadianTSi Captain 207 Rep 602 Posts Drives: 2014 535 xDrive Diesel Join Date: Feb 2007 Location: Alberta iTrader: (0)	If you look at the Graph, when torque was down Horsepower was also down, which makes sense... Power just happened to peak a little higher, its still basically the same from 5K on.
	Appreciate 0 Quote

10-16-2007, 12:54 PM	#14
Sniz Lieutenant General 654 Rep 10,587 Posts Drives: e92 335 - gone // e36 M3 turbo Join Date: Mar 2007 Location: Ellicott City, MD iTrader: (1)	Looks like the dyno w/ 100% across the board is actually smoother...no? __________________
	Appreciate 0 Quote

10-16-2007, 01:58 PM	#22
BMW_TT Colonel 224 Rep 2,548 Posts Drives: E92 335i Join Date: Aug 2007 Location: Dallas, TX iTrader: (4)	is that on a stock 335i? sorry if it was covered.
	Appreciate 0 Quote