V2.0 disappointment...

max boost · 10-04-2007, 09:11 PM

i was unable to get a good full 1/4 run in. the DA is not so good tonight.
anyway i was able to bust out a couple 1/8 mile runs. the car definatley got heated soaked.

well here u go....

[/IMG]

RiXst3r · 10-04-2007, 09:12 PM

um... is this a joke?

0-60 in 3.9 is a dissapointment?

Nyulak · 10-04-2007, 09:13 PM

DAMN!

oddjob2021 · 10-04-2007, 09:14 PM

the 1/8 mile seems right... but a 3.9 0-60????

stillclaimndp · 10-04-2007, 09:16 PM

3.90 0-60 that is PRETTY disappointing lol... that 1/8 mile looks on par for 12.4?

toofasttooslow · 10-04-2007, 09:16 PM

Unless that's 60KpH

I'll take an under 4 second car anyday!

kaji335i · 10-04-2007, 09:16 PM

yea what a disappointment, everyone cancel you v2.0 orders today

yahtzee · 10-04-2007, 09:17 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by oddjob2021

3.9 0-60????

bmwzimmer · 10-04-2007, 09:18 PM

Time for a new intercooler.
Great times though!!!

DrDomer · 10-04-2007, 09:23 PM

Holy shiiite... That's rediculous. I never thought I'd see a sub 4sec 0-60 time. The 1/8th mile time is dynomite too... wow... just wow.

Maroon · 10-04-2007, 09:26 PM

lol g-tech

choiffer · 10-04-2007, 09:26 PM

LOL... are u tryna tell me a 3 series ran 0-60 in 3.9 and the quarter mile in 10 seconds ? with a ecu chip. Somethin doesnt seem right to me.

sflgator · 10-04-2007, 09:26 PM

Max Boost -- how are u possibly getting those numbers????

That's just insane!!!

Either your car is a factory freak (and w/ PROcede v2.0, it's just the meanest ANIMAL around!

) or your timer is a bit off. Not saying that it's absolutely impossible, but...

AND...don't say it's b/c you set the TQ Curve ALL @ 100%.

btw -- what was your 60ft. on that run?

Please, tell us your secrets!

max boost · 10-04-2007, 09:27 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RiXst3r

um... is this a joke?

0-60 in 3.9 is a dissapointment?

hehehehe got ur attention.....i did have some weird stuff happen though....the car shifted real early on one of my runs.... it did the 2>3 shift at like 4200 rpms???? ive had this happen before.....is the car making to much torque and commanding a shift?

stillclaimndp · 10-04-2007, 09:28 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by choiffer

LOL... are u tryna tell me a 3 series ran 0-60 in 3.9 and the quarter mile in 10 seconds ? with a ecu chip. Somethin doesnt seem right to me.

1/8 mile brohem....

Ryan@Motorwerks · 10-04-2007, 09:29 PM

Any other mods?

Sniz · 10-04-2007, 09:31 PM

Were you timing your vette?????? If not you should post some videos and Gtech graphs anyway just for me.......please.

stillclaimndp · 10-04-2007, 09:31 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by sflgator

Max Boost -- how are u possibly getting those numbers????

That's just insane!!!

Either your car is a factory freak (and w/ PROcede v2.0, it's just the meanest ANIMAL around!

) or your timer is a bit off. Not saying that it's absolutely impossible, but...

AND...don't say it's b/c you set the TQ Curve ALL @ 100%.

btw -- what was your 60ft. on that run?

Shiv's car felt like it was running high 3's to me... mine with just the standard v2... i would guess more like 4-4.3 seconds. A friend of mine guessed high 3's on Shiv's car as well...

sflgator · 10-04-2007, 09:33 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by stillclaimndp

Shiv's car felt like it was running high 3's to me... mine with just the standard v2... i would guess more like 4-4.3 seconds. A friend of mine guessed high 3's on Shiv's car as well...

OMFG...sick...sick...sick!!!!!

I think I need to change my v2.0 TQ Curve values tomorrow!

retrodrive · 10-04-2007, 09:35 PM

I dont believe those numbers...but I want to! Unless the time is taken at an official track, I call bs.

max boost · 10-04-2007, 09:36 PM

he guys i have no reason to bullshit....now whether is right or wrong i cannot say. i can say though that it was wicked dead hook. i have also used it at the track and it extremely accurate....btw it isnt a g-tech.

the 60ft was a 1.67

also guys to net the best time u'll still need to shift, having the ecu shift will NOT net u the best times. if u dont ull feel the car lay over.

as far as doubters i can understand, guess we will see on the 18th @ atco.

sflgator · 10-04-2007, 09:37 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by retrodrive

I dont believe those numbers...but I want to! Unless the time is taken at an official track, I call bs.

I'm sure max boost will be going to the ATCO track soon; he does currently have the fastest PROcede 335i (v1.4x) timeslip posted on DragTimes.com.

10-04-2007, 09:11 PM	#1
max boost Lieutenant 40 Rep 408 Posts Drives: 07 335i Join Date: Nov 2006 Location: east side iTrader: (1)	V2.0 disappointment... i was unable to get a good full 1/4 run in. the DA is not so good tonight. anyway i was able to bust out a couple 1/8 mile runs. the car definatley got heated soaked. well here u go.... [/IMG]
	Appreciate 0 Tweet Quote

10-04-2007, 09:12 PM	#2
RiXst3r 274 Rep 6,510 Posts Drives: M235i Join Date: Sep 2006 Location: Ohio iTrader: (14)	um... is this a joke? 0-60 in 3.9 is a dissapointment?
	Appreciate 0 Quote

10-04-2007, 09:13 PM	#3
Nyulak Captain 29 Rep 957 Posts Drives: 2022 X3 M40i Join Date: Feb 2007 Location: SheffVill, OH iTrader: (4) Garage List 2009 BMW 535xi [10.00]	DAMN!
	Appreciate 0 Quote

10-04-2007, 09:14 PM	#4
oddjob2021 ASR Turbos+LSD+Meth= :D 73 Rep 1,517 Posts Drives: E92 335i Join Date: May 2007 Location: Miami, FL iTrader: (0) Garage List 2007 E92 335i [0.00]	the 1/8 mile seems right... but a 3.9 0-60???? __________________ 2007 335i Coupe Mods: Check the Garage
	Appreciate 0 Quote

10-04-2007, 09:16 PM	#5
stillclaimndp Dancing Machine 47 Rep 1,419 Posts Drives: 335i e90 ZSP Join Date: Aug 2007 Location: Walnut Creek, Ca iTrader: (0)	3.90 0-60 that is PRETTY disappointing lol... that 1/8 mile looks on par for 12.4? __________________ 2007 e90 & 1981 Corvette Predecessors: 2007 BMW 335i E92, 2006 M5, 2008 Viper SRT10 Coupe, 2005 Viper Yellow, 2006 Corvette Z51, 2009 Challenger SRT8, 2006 S4, 2001.5 Nogaro Blue S4, 2006 GTI w/ DSG, 06 Evo IX, 04 S4, 04 911x51, 03 Evo VIII, 98 Eclipse GSX, 96 GST, 92 Galant Vr-4, '70 Grand Prix Model J, '70 Nova, '68 Firebird
	Appreciate 0 Quote

10-04-2007, 09:16 PM	#6
toofasttooslow Galactic Emperor 75 Rep 801 Posts Drives: Fast Join Date: Mar 2007 Location: WA iTrader: (3)	Unless that's 60KpH I'll take an under 4 second car anyday!
	Appreciate 0 Quote

10-04-2007, 09:16 PM	#7
kaji335i Lieutenant Colonel 36 Rep 1,896 Posts Drives: e92 335i Join Date: Nov 2006 Location: that place iTrader: (0)	yea what a disappointment, everyone cancel you v2.0 orders today
	Appreciate 0 Quote

10-04-2007, 09:18 PM	#9
bmwzimmer Major 35 Rep 1,084 Posts Drives: 335 Join Date: Jan 2007 Location: 91 octane states iTrader: (0)	Time for a new intercooler. Great times though!!!
	Appreciate 0 Quote

10-04-2007, 09:23 PM	#10
DrDomer Major 39 Rep 1,349 Posts Drives: 2004 330ci ZHP, 1999 Miata Join Date: Nov 2006 Location: Iowa iTrader: (0)	Holy shiiite... That's rediculous. I never thought I'd see a sub 4sec 0-60 time. The 1/8th mile time is dynomite too... wow... just wow. __________________ Any man who can drive safely while kissing a pretty girl is simply not giving the kiss the attention it deserves. ~Albert Einstein
	Appreciate 0 Quote

10-04-2007, 09:26 PM	#11
Maroon Private First Class 5 Rep 129 Posts Drives: Z4C Join Date: Feb 2007 Location: Qatar iTrader: (0)	lol g-tech
	Appreciate 0 Quote

10-04-2007, 09:26 PM	#12
choiffer First Lieutenant 19 Rep 375 Posts Drives: 08 E92 335i Coupe Join Date: Jul 2007 Location: Philadelphia, Pa iTrader: (0) Garage List 2008 335i Coupe [0.00] 2006 G35 Coupe [0.00]	LOL... are u tryna tell me a 3 series ran 0-60 in 3.9 and the quarter mile in 10 seconds ? with a ecu chip. Somethin doesnt seem right to me. __________________ 2008 335i Coupe Alpine White/Black Dakota
	Appreciate 0 Quote

10-04-2007, 09:26 PM	#13
sflgator Major General 148 Rep 5,389 Posts Drives: '09 MB C63 AMG & '08 MB GL450 Join Date: Oct 2006 Location: U.S. iTrader: (1)	Max Boost -- how are u possibly getting those numbers???? That's just insane!!! Either your car is a factory freak (and w/ PROcede v2.0, it's just the meanest ANIMAL around! ) or your timer is a bit off. Not saying that it's absolutely impossible, but... AND...don't say it's b/c you set the TQ Curve ALL @ 100%. btw -- what was your 60ft. on that run? Please, tell us your secrets! __________________ \|2009 RENNtech MB C63 AMG \| Black/Black Leather/Black Maple \| Premium II \| MultiMedia \| iPod \| \| TeleAid \| Charcoal Filter Delete \| BMC High-Flow Air Filters \| High-Flow Secondary Cats \| Clear Side Markers \|
	Appreciate 0 Quote

10-04-2007, 09:29 PM	#16
Ryan@Motorwerks Captain 48 Rep 963 Posts Drives: X3M Join Date: Oct 2005 Location: Houston, TX iTrader: (0)	Any other mods?
	Appreciate 0 Quote

10-04-2007, 09:31 PM	#17
Sniz Lieutenant General 656 Rep 10,587 Posts Drives: e92 335 - gone // e36 M3 turbo Join Date: Mar 2007 Location: Ellicott City, MD iTrader: (1)	Were you timing your vette?????? If not you should post some videos and Gtech graphs anyway just for me.......please. __________________
	Appreciate 0 Quote

10-04-2007, 09:35 PM	#20
retrodrive Lieutenant Colonel 150 Rep 1,938 Posts Drives: 335i Join Date: Jan 2007 Location: Irvine, CA iTrader: (8)	I dont believe those numbers...but I want to! Unless the time is taken at an official track, I call bs.
	Appreciate 0 Quote

10-04-2007, 09:36 PM	#21
max boost Lieutenant 40 Rep 408 Posts Drives: 07 335i Join Date: Nov 2006 Location: east side iTrader: (1)	he guys i have no reason to bullshit....now whether is right or wrong i cannot say. i can say though that it was wicked dead hook. i have also used it at the track and it extremely accurate....btw it isnt a g-tech. the 60ft was a 1.67 also guys to net the best time u'll still need to shift, having the ecu shift will NOT net u the best times. if u dont ull feel the car lay over. as far as doubters i can understand, guess we will see on the 18th @ atco.
	Appreciate 0 Quote