05-08-2013, 05:51 AM | #1 |
Private First Class
35
Rep 168
Posts |
SR-Racing & PP-Performance F10 M5
The Blue M5 F10 Project car has been tested 2 days ago, and its holding the record for the Fastest M5.
Mods: PPP StageVIP Tune / Akrapovic Exhaust / BMC Filters / some secrets Upgraded turbos have NOT been installed yet, they are sent out to germany for extra modification. The car isnt ready yet, still waiting for MANY parts, but i wanted to share some numbers 0-60 / 2.0 0-100 / 3.6 100-200 / 6.7 WATCH IN HD... Tuners, please if you have better results, dont post a picture, video please 0-100 100-200 I chose the same song for both videos because my friend Simon from MHR loves it
__________________
Last edited by GhanemMBN; 05-08-2013 at 07:02 AM.. Reason: HD |
05-08-2013, 06:42 AM | #2 |
Private First Class
4
Rep 108
Posts |
Here we go again.
Why need to constantly mention MHR in your comments on Ttube MHR posts theirs and let the people decide. Post your results and let it stand on it's own merit. |
Appreciate
0
|
05-08-2013, 07:02 AM | #3 |
Private First Class
35
Rep 168
Posts |
They r our friends, and our only competitors
__________________
|
Appreciate
0
|
05-08-2013, 07:11 AM | #4 | |
Major General
1714
Rep 5,110
Posts |
Quote:
Why not let the videos and results talk for themselves? Why do you have to talk bad about your competition? Just look at the noise your comments about MHR creates, instead of just getting attention for your results... If you hadn't made those comments about MHR, we all would comment on the results instead of on your statements about others... And, you now demand that all others post verifiable videos (quite interesting coming from someone who has the record in posting unverified claims previously to now demand that others don't do what you have done in the past...) I would like to see the video of your claimed 2,5second run from 0-100: http://f10.m5post.com/forums/showthr...ighlight=0-100 You claimed that the car can do 0-100 1,1sec quicker than in the vids you posted today... |
|
Appreciate
0
|
05-08-2013, 07:14 AM | #5 |
Private First Class
35
Rep 168
Posts |
Why cant you guys understand that we are friends with MHR, we use to sit and talk for hours with Mr.Simon when he was here in Abu dhabi. We use some parts from MHR. But we have a friendly competition thats all. They can also comment and see their reply
__________________
|
Appreciate
0
|
05-08-2013, 07:50 AM | #8 | |
Major General
1714
Rep 5,110
Posts |
Quote:
And MHR doesn't mention you or others in a negative way when they represent their stuff. So, it's just a one way street of negative comments... As I said previously, if you just concentrated on posting the stuff about PP you would not take away so much focus from what you want to tell us... I'm sure that would serve both you and PP better |
|
Appreciate
0
|
05-08-2013, 07:56 AM | #9 | |
Major General
1714
Rep 5,110
Posts |
Quote:
You posted this allmost 3 months ago: http://f10.m5post.com/forums/showthr...ighlight=0-100 And this 2 months ago: http://f10.m5post.com/forums/showthr...ighlight=0-100 Why not give others some time as well to post results etc? In the first link you clearly stated that videos would be released by April 1st. You have posted a video today (May 8th) that has very different 0-100 times than what you claimed then... If you can be late with results, why start questioning other companies? |
|
Appreciate
0
|
05-08-2013, 09:17 AM | #10 | |
Private First Class
35
Rep 168
Posts |
Quote:
First of all, im not questioning any company, im asking where are they with their project, all respect to IND & AMS 2- I was on the phone with Simon one hour ago and all you see in the forums is friendly competition. Are there any companies getting like our results? Its just PPP and MHR. Whats the point of tuning and spending thousands of dollars if there is no competition? We're not the type that paint reflectors or grills or window tint and consider it as a modification. We go hard on the engine until it gives us the results that satisfy us, and btw, even though SR-Racing got the best results, they are not even 50% satisfied 3. We had some problems with the upgraded turbos so we sent them back to Germany and waiting for them to be back, thats why nothing was ready by the 1st of April.
__________________
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
05-08-2013, 09:27 AM | #12 |
Private First Class
35
Rep 168
Posts |
I can claim this is Stage VIP M5! 100-200 in 6.2... BUT, is there proof? We want a video, just like i posted 2! If you are going to go with MHR's 6.3, then you have to believe that this 6.2 is our car / Simon: ill not take you for shisha if u dont post a video showing 6.3 / PPP are the record holders so far
__________________
|
Appreciate
0
|
05-08-2013, 09:37 AM | #13 | |
Major General
1714
Rep 5,110
Posts |
Quote:
Now you are telling us that no one else can post pictures, like you have done in the past??? And saying that MHR has posted a fake picture... |
|
Appreciate
0
|
05-08-2013, 09:45 AM | #14 |
Private First Class
35
Rep 168
Posts |
Im saying i want a video, i can post photos all day
__________________
|
Appreciate
0
|
05-08-2013, 09:53 AM | #15 |
Major General
1714
Rep 5,110
Posts |
|
Appreciate
0
|
05-08-2013, 10:34 AM | #16 |
Major General
2872
Rep 7,885
Posts |
Wait what?! 0-60mph in only 2.0 seconds?! Am I reading this correctly?? Or is this kph??
On a rear wheel drive car? Did you guys put drag radials on it or something?? Edit: Ok nevermind, I figured out you guys all mean kph not mph. Still 0-100kph or 0-62mph in 3.6 seconds is still not that impressive when a stock F10 can do 0-60mph in 3.7 seconds with launch control. In the video I can't tell if you use Launch Control or not.
__________________
Last edited by RPiM5; 05-08-2013 at 10:45 AM.. |
Appreciate
0
|
05-08-2013, 11:03 AM | #17 | |
Knight Commander
559
Rep 5,948
Posts
Drives: 2014 911 Turbo S
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Buckhead
iTrader: (0)
Garage List 2014 Porsche 911 Tu ... [10.00]
2015 Mercedes-Benz ... [0.00] 2015 Jaguar F Type R [0.00] 2014 BMW M5 [0.00] |
Quote:
Agreed with previous posters on the credibility of this source, he comes across as inconsistent, prone to hyperbole, and questionable when into comes to evidence.
__________________
2022 Mercedes-Benz EQS 580
2020 Mercedes-Benz GLE 450 Ordered: EQS580, BMW IX, Lucid Air Touring, Corvette Stingray |
|
Appreciate
0
|
05-08-2013, 11:19 AM | #18 | |
Major General
2872
Rep 7,885
Posts |
Quote:
__________________
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
05-08-2013, 12:09 PM | #19 |
Private First Class
35
Rep 168
Posts |
Not my car, im just posting the progress
__________________
|
Appreciate
0
|
05-08-2013, 12:14 PM | #20 | |
Private First Class
35
Rep 168
Posts |
Quote:
If it was launched, the rpm would go up to 3000 rpm then it will accelerate, so it wasnt launched
__________________
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
05-08-2013, 12:20 PM | #21 | |
Private First Class
35
Rep 168
Posts |
Quote:
What about 100-200, the stock M5 isnt even close to 6.7, its in high 7s
__________________
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
05-08-2013, 12:29 PM | #22 |
cidair
83
Rep 516
Posts |
My bone stock M5 does: 100-200 km/h 7.1s and 200-250 km/h 6.6s
Tested with VBOX at +8 deg C, 50% tank, 1 person, level surface autobahn. Just to compare
__________________
2016 435d xDrive
Previous:2019 M340i, 2014 335dx,2012 M5,2011 550ix,2008 M3,2007 330xd,2005 M5,2004 545iA,2000M5. Last edited by cidair; 05-08-2013 at 12:35 PM.. |
Appreciate
0
|
Post Reply |
Bookmarks |
|
|