|
|
|
|
|
|
BMW Garage | BMW Meets | Register | Today's Posts | Search |
|
BMW 3-Series (E90 E92) Forum
>
Flywheel...yay or nay?
|
|
06-01-2012, 04:45 PM | #1 |
The bigger they are...
18
Rep 264
Posts |
Flywheel...yay or nay?
I am about to purchase a SPEC clutch for my 335i. They have an option for a 14lb flywheel that is rebuildable. Just wanted to get some opinion on whether or not to do a lightweight flywheel? Any opinions are much appreciated!!!
__________________
Tom Williams BMW Service Advisor
'07 335i Sport 219M Wheels, MMW CF Lip, Shadowline Taillights, Vishnu Procede, BMS DCI, BMS OCC, Aasco LW Flywheel, South Bend Clutch, Turner 90mm Studs, Stoptech pads rotors and lines, BMS LED Tag Lights, BMS Clutch Stop, BMS Clutch Non-Delay Valve, ACS Style Rear Glass Spoiler |
06-01-2012, 04:53 PM | #2 |
Team Zissou
3065
Rep 10,197
Posts |
if you can get over the rattle then it's great. I've had the stage 3 clutch+lightweight flywheel for 10's of thousands of miles now and it performs fantastic... you just need to get over the noise (i hold the clutch down at stop lights).
|
Appreciate
0
|
06-01-2012, 04:57 PM | #3 |
Brigadier General
313
Rep 3,262
Posts |
My opinion is that it is mandatory to either resurface or replace the flywheel when you replace the clutch, if you want it to last. If you could find a shop to resurface your existing flywheel I can't see a reason why you should spend the money on a lightweight flywheel that could chatter a lot and diminish the "daily driver" and "sleeper" status of a 335i. I think that a better option is to spend $700 on a new OEM flywheel.
__________________
|
Appreciate
0
|
06-01-2012, 05:05 PM | #4 |
Some say...
239
Rep 4,296
Posts
Drives: Fresh
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Baton Rouge n NOLA
|
I love the one I just got from clutchmasters. The way I see it is if you have the transmission out and you are replacing the clutch you either need to resurface it or change it anyways, so why not upgrade? The chatter isn't that bad, but I do find myself holding down the clutch to shut it up at stop lights. Honestly though, if the radio is up a little or the AC is blasting you can't hear it. For me, the pros surpass the cons.
__________________
I have exhaust and an intake... |
Appreciate
0
|
06-01-2012, 07:04 PM | #5 |
Banned
25
Rep 838
Posts |
Does anyone know the weight of the stock FW vs the light weight FW? As I recall a lighter FW=quicker spool up! I'd love to hear what all the "chatter" is about....a sound clip would be a great deciding factor. Are we talking marbles in a coffee can sound?
|
Appreciate
0
|
06-01-2012, 07:14 PM | #6 |
Major General
557
Rep 5,367
Posts |
Installed lighten fly wheels on many other previous cars including my own. The owners had a case of the placebo effect. I didnt notice crap and i even kept telling myself....it revs quicker!?? fast forward 100k miles later replaced it with an oem wheel and the car felt the same.
To sum up just run the lighten wheel so you can tell yourself its faster.
__________________
You can follow my builds on IG: Tee212 |
Appreciate
0
|
06-01-2012, 07:30 PM | #7 | |
Team Zissou
3065
Rep 10,197
Posts |
Quote:
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
06-01-2012, 07:39 PM | #8 |
Major General
557
Rep 5,367
Posts |
Clutch chatter isnt something that you can hear at idle or in motion. Its a combination of increased pressure plate force + kevlar/friction disc material type/puck style/unsprung disc. Its a sticky vibrating grabby sensation as the power train engages. You and the whole car will feel it.
__________________
You can follow my builds on IG: Tee212 |
Appreciate
0
|
06-01-2012, 08:50 PM | #11 |
Team Zissou
3065
Rep 10,197
Posts |
does it? because my setup has been absolutely flawless for probably 30,000 miles or so... and it's what shiv has been running with the upgraded turbo (same stage as me) with no issues at all.
It all comes down to installer competence. many bad reviews of any clutch is due to install error Last edited by jpsimon; 06-01-2012 at 09:24 PM.. |
Appreciate
0
|
06-01-2012, 08:52 PM | #12 | |
Team Zissou
3065
Rep 10,197
Posts |
Quote:
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
06-01-2012, 10:46 PM | #13 | |
Major General
130
Rep 5,040
Posts |
Quote:
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
06-02-2012, 04:29 AM | #14 | |
Some say...
239
Rep 4,296
Posts
Drives: Fresh
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Baton Rouge n NOLA
|
Quote:
I said that same thing when I installed mine, I can hold the revs up just a tad and it goes away.
__________________
I have exhaust and an intake... |
|
Appreciate
0
|
06-02-2012, 05:18 AM | #15 | |
Major
68
Rep 1,432
Posts |
Quote:
Paying hundreds for removing 17lbs makes a difference in your wallet, but it does not result in any measurable effect in acceleration. I hear Clutchmasters resurfaces the stock flywheel for $30. |
|
Appreciate
0
|
06-02-2012, 05:59 AM | #16 |
Brigadier General
313
Rep 3,262
Posts |
You can, with the INPA software. The car will just consume a bit more fuel in city driving.
__________________
|
Appreciate
0
|
06-02-2012, 06:07 PM | #17 | |
Banned
25
Rep 838
Posts |
Quote:
I also like the fact that 17 lbs is being shaved off the car...especially in the front end where it counts! If we measured the power output of an engine first with light flywheel and then again with the standard part on an engine dyno, no change in power will be seen. At first it appears that the light flywheel has done nothing and was a total waste of cash as some have already suggested. This is not the case. A dyno that shows max power at constant revs does not demonstrate what happens to an engine's power output in real life situations - like acceleration. If an engine is accelerated on a dyno (we are talking about a rate of around 2000rpm a second ) it would show a power output of around 20%-25% less than at the constant rev state. The reason for this is that when accelerating a vehicle the engine not only has to push the total mass of the car but the internal components of the engine need to be accelerated also. This tends to absorb more power as the extra power is used accelerating the internal mass of the engine components and is why a motor accelerating on a dyno will produce less power than at constant revs. Also it must be remembered that the rate of acceleration on the engine internals is much greater that the rest of the car. This would then suggest that by lightening the flywheel, less power would be required to accelerate it and therefore more power would be available to push the car along. |
|
Appreciate
0
|
06-02-2012, 07:55 PM | #18 |
First Lieutenant
22
Rep 367
Posts |
That is bad for the pressure plate.
|
Appreciate
0
|
06-02-2012, 07:59 PM | #19 | |
First Lieutenant
22
Rep 367
Posts |
Quote:
This is just not true...there was something fishy about your set up or you are the same type of person who can't tell the difference between oem DP's and Cattless DP's. |
|
Appreciate
0
|
06-02-2012, 08:03 PM | #20 | |
First Lieutenant
22
Rep 367
Posts |
Quote:
? |
|
Appreciate
0
|
06-02-2012, 08:04 PM | #21 |
Major General
557
Rep 5,367
Posts |
again its on my previous cars and others and not a n54. This is not engine specific, just going off what ive experienced. But you can go ahead and keep telling yourself its faster.
__________________
You can follow my builds on IG: Tee212 |
Appreciate
0
|
06-02-2012, 08:08 PM | #22 | |
First Lieutenant
22
Rep 367
Posts |
Quote:
http://chicaneculture.com/2010/05/basics-flywheel/ "If you accept that you will accelerate faster with a lighter flywheel, you also have to accept that you will lose speed faster and have to work harder (more frequent input) to maintain your momentum. There isn’t any power increase in the scheme of things, just a change in the rate of rotational momentum and the storage efficiency of this momentum." |
|
Appreciate
0
|
Bookmarks |
|
|