|
|
|
|
|
|
BMW Garage | BMW Meets | Register | Today's Posts | Search |
|
BMW 3-Series (E90 E92) Forum
>
335 and G37 1/4 mile... Which is eventually faster?
|
|
06-27-2007, 09:41 PM | #1 |
Banned
205
Rep 2,002
Posts |
335 and G37 1/4 mile... Which is eventually faster?
OK. I had an argument with a friend of mine in regards to the 1/4 mile and 0-100 mph numbers posted by Motortrend (335i vs G37).
0-100 mph 335i = 12.7 sec G37 = 13.9 sec 1/4 mile 335i = 13.7 @ 104 mph G37 = 14.0 @ 101 mph My friend claimes that the G37 is catching up to the 335 because at 100 mph the 335 was 1.2 sec ahead of the G37 and at the 1/4 mile (wich is only a few mph faster) it was only 0.3 seconds ahead of the G37. How can this be true? I told him the 1/4 mile test and the 0-100 mph test are two different things. What do you guys think? No flamming...
__________________
|
06-27-2007, 09:46 PM | #2 |
Lieutenant Colonel
296
Rep 1,515
Posts
Drives: Ever changing fleet
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Alabama
|
You can be assured the that G37 will be faster than 101 in the 1/4th. The sedans (hell, even the old sedans) traps 101-102, sometimes even 103 with significantly less power. I understand the 37 weighs nearly 3700 lbs, but its putting down about 300 whp.
__________________
23 iX M60, 24 GT3 RS Weissach, 22 Rivian R1T, 23 RS3, 13 E92 M3 Competition: Akra Evo, KW V3, etc
|
Appreciate
0
|
06-27-2007, 10:28 PM | #5 |
Brigadier General
179
Rep 3,125
Posts |
If you looking at straight line performance just look at trap times.
As far as the twisties go, i wouldnt know.
__________________
Previous - E90 335i, E82 135i, E89 Z4 3.5SI, Range Rover S/C, Ultra White RCF, Maserati Granturismo
Current Lexus: SMG LC500 performance package Porsche:1973 911E Ferrari 575 SA, 458 Italia |
Appreciate
0
|
06-27-2007, 11:11 PM | #7 |
Lieutenant
36
Rep 526
Posts |
|
Appreciate
0
|
06-28-2007, 01:23 AM | #8 | |
Banned
205
Rep 2,002
Posts |
Quote:
Edmunds got 286 whp...just like most of the 335 get.
__________________
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
06-28-2007, 01:36 AM | #9 |
Major
58
Rep 1,305
Posts |
i could care less if a G37 is faster or slower than a 335I....i really dont think an infiniti can replicate the driving experience of that of a BMW!!!
On the highway...straight aways or through a winding road...its tough to beat a BMW! there is not another car that is produced today in the price range of a 335I that can remove the smile on my face every time I get behind the wheel! By the way...I ate a porsche for lunch today...yum!...man was he pissed!!! cheers, shiggy
__________________
2009 Jet Black E92 M3, DCT, Nav, Novillo Leather, PDC, EDC, BBS CHR's 20", Yokohama Advan Sports Tires, Eiback Pro-Kit Springs, Dinan Pullies and Dinan Stage1 software, black grills, black side gills, alcantara shift and ebrake boot.
|
Appreciate
0
|
06-28-2007, 01:59 AM | #10 |
Colonel
174
Rep 2,916
Posts |
not sure about the numbers but:
BMW hp > infiniti hp
__________________
19" velocity CSL replicas staggured // Continental sport contact 2: rear: 255/35/19, Front: 235/35/19 // Blacklines // rear OEM spoiler // y-connector // 30% v-kool tint all around // Black Roof/Mirrors // H&R Sport springs // H&R TRAK+ 15mm spacers // BMW never makes ordinary cars . . . |
Appreciate
0
|
06-28-2007, 02:06 AM | #11 |
.
812
Rep 3,974
Posts |
|
Appreciate
0
|
06-28-2007, 03:14 AM | #12 |
A^M=G is nothing w/o the Power of ///M
171
Rep 1,816
Posts |
cant stand Infiniti's ive been a BMW boy since day one and for me it was clear 330>G35
__________________
Indianapolis Red BMW ///M5
|
Appreciate
0
|
06-28-2007, 09:52 AM | #13 |
Lieutenant Colonel
296
Rep 1,515
Posts
Drives: Ever changing fleet
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Alabama
|
Its been a while ago. Somebody posted up a dynapak readout comparing an 05 g35C 6 speed against the G37 6 speed. Old G did like 265 whp, new one did 298 whp, I believe.
__________________
23 iX M60, 24 GT3 RS Weissach, 22 Rivian R1T, 23 RS3, 13 E92 M3 Competition: Akra Evo, KW V3, etc
|
Appreciate
0
|
06-28-2007, 10:52 AM | #14 | |
Brigadier General
327
Rep 4,484
Posts |
Quote:
The difference lies, most likely, in a few areas: First and foremost, two different cars tested on two different days and possibly different tracks or locations. The other discrepancy is probably the shift points. The 335i got to 100 mph 1.2 seconds faster than the G37 and only (in that example) .3 seconds faster in the 1/4 mile because of shift points. Tell your friend to look at the trap speeds. If one car crosses the line doing 104 mph the other doing 101 mph how is it possible the slower car is catching up. The car that trapped at 104 will be going 3 mph faster than the other so the other couldn't possibly be catching up. If the G37 was catching up the 1/4 mile times and speeds would look like this: 335i: 13.7 @ 104 mph G37: 14.0 @ 104.5 Then the G37 would of been behind and still lost the race, but catching up because it had a faster trap speed. |
|
Appreciate
0
|
06-28-2007, 11:07 AM | #16 |
Brigadier General
327
Rep 4,484
Posts |
Oh, and as to "which will eventually be faster"
well, at this point that's hard to say. I don't think the G37 would ever catch the 335i. However, it IS possible that as speeds continue to climb the G37 might make up some lost ground. By that I mean. Smaller displacement turbocharged engines begin to lose more speed than larger displacement higher revving naturally aspirated motors. It will also depend on aerodynamics. I'd venture to say the G37 is more aerodynamic than the 335i coupe since the OLD G35 is more aerodynamic than the 335i. So, once the 335i is going say 120 mph it might be accelerating at a slower rate than the G37 and the G37 might begin to "catch up". But it won't matter as the 335i will have a several car length lead at that point. The G37 might just slowly begin to get a bit closer, but it will still be a couple car lengths behind by the time both cars reach their governed top speeds (probably both 150 or 155 mph). |
Appreciate
0
|
06-28-2007, 11:43 AM | #19 |
Private First Class
8
Rep 115
Posts |
The guy posts an interesting question about the physics of acceleration concerning specific motor trend numbers and everyone turns it into another G v 335 war.
The two relevant points are: 1. When the 335 is at the 1/4 mile mark, its going 104 while the G is probably going less than 100. If you were in that G, you would see the 335 moving away from you at 5 or 6 mph at least. 2. The reason that the G is only .3 seconds away at the 1/4 mark is not because its catching up, but because its only had to get to 101 mph in that amount of time, while the 335 had to get to 104 mph. By the time the G crosses the 1/4 mark (at 14 seconds), the 335 is probably going 107 mph or more. It could take more than a second for the G to go from 101 to 107. Because of the speed advantage the 335 has at the 1/4 mark, it probably made it to 107 1.3 seconds ahead of the G. The OP should tell his friend he is an idiot. |
Appreciate
0
|
06-28-2007, 01:22 PM | #20 | |
First Lieutenant
6
Rep 304
Posts |
Quote:
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
06-28-2007, 01:42 PM | #21 |
Major General
148
Rep 5,389
Posts |
It's really quite simple...
The G37 on paper has more HP (but less TQ) than the 335i. However, in real-world tests, the G37 and the 335i are closer in HP than on paper, but the 335i has much more TQ and it's lighter than the G37. This is why the 335i is faster and would continue to be faster than the G37, even after the 1/4 mi. all the way up to the speed limiter.
__________________
|2009 RENNtech MB C63 AMG | Black/Black Leather/Black Maple | Premium II | MultiMedia | iPod | | TeleAid | Charcoal Filter Delete | BMC High-Flow Air Filters | High-Flow Secondary Cats | Clear Side Markers | |
Appreciate
0
|
06-28-2007, 04:01 PM | #22 | |
Captain
17
Rep 705
Posts |
Quote:
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
Bookmarks |
|
|