PROCeded 335i 1/4 Mile Time

Ado · 06-23-2007, 01:05 AM

Just got back from the track. I was actually hopping for a better time after seeing some of the times on DragTimes.com

60' 2.061
330 5.622
1/8 8.573
MPH 84.74
1000 11.061
1/4 13.201
MPH 106.24

The 2nd best was

13.349 @ 109.25 60' was 2.265

I can't get a good launch with these tires at all I got the 17" stock tires on so I'm not surprised that I can't get a good launch.

What kind of tires did some of you guys have on when you did the 1/4's ?

E90ice · 06-23-2007, 01:40 AM

I'm no expert, but if you ask me, your 60' time isn't too great.

What do you mean 17" tires? Do you have sport package?...mine are 18.

Ado · 06-23-2007, 02:05 AM

No sport package. I got everything other then the sports package. I decided that I'd go with after market rims so I didn't want to spend the extra money on the sports package. I didn't really fancy the sports seats either.

Although overall I think I should have gone with the Sports Package, had I known it would have come with an Oil cooler I would have been all over it.

The 60' isn't too too bad but obviously with better tires I would have been able to launch the car better I think.

OpenFlash · 06-23-2007, 02:07 AM

109.25mph. Good trap speed for an otherwise stock car!

BMWPower06 · 06-23-2007, 02:15 AM

WOW 13.2 with a 2 second 60 foot, makes me wonder how the procede guys are getting 13.0 with their 2 second 60 foot.

Ado · 06-23-2007, 02:25 AM

^
Yeah it's interesting but I am noticing a better trap speed for some of them. Here is Shiv's run as an example from DragTimes.com

111.177 8.664 86.770 2.227

13.195 @ 111.177 where his 60' was 2.227

Then again he did have his exhaust on and dynoed @ i think 20 more HP then me. I think he may have been on 18"s though not sure.

hotrod2448 · 06-23-2007, 07:26 AM

Right lane?

rallycobra · 06-23-2007, 07:51 AM

If you had drag radials and maybe a lsd, your 60' would be about a 1.8". Every tenth you save on the 60' is worth about 2 tenths at the end of the track. You could have easily run a 12.8 @109 with traction. A trap speed of 109mph with a stock exhaust is awsome! You are making tons of power.

max boost · 06-23-2007, 07:59 AM

i ran a 12.7X w/procede and stock tires...killer da
on an other day, with bfg dr i went a 12.54....horrible da

max boost · 06-23-2007, 08:00 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by rallycobra

If you had drag radials and maybe a lsd, your 60' would be about a 1.8". Every tenth you save on the 60' is worth about 2 tenths at the end of the track. You could have easily run a 12.8 @109 with traction. A trap speed of 109mph with a stock exhaust is awsome! You are making tons of power.

dam good mph

sflgator · 06-23-2007, 09:26 AM

OK...so I went to my local 1/4 mi. track last night too. I got in 6 runs. I hardly spun my wheels/tires at all, but I have 19" Mich PS2s.

What a fun time; my best time was 13.097 sec. @ 106.67mph (w/ a 60ft. time of 1.977 sec.). My fastest trap speed was 107.29mph, but on that run, I did 13.171sec.

I know I could get into the high 12's (~ 12.8-12.9 sec.) with better weather and track conditions...it was 84 degrees F w/ ~ 65% R.H...the air was so thick last night, you could cut it with a knife.

I'll scan in and post up my best timeslip next week.

In regards to my Beltronics FX2 -- I tested it last night at the track, and it was off by less than 2/10ths of a sec., but.....it was SLOWER than my actual track time.

So, Kujo is right and wrong, at least for MY specific FX2 unit. It showed 13.2 sec. when the track timeslip shows 13.097 sec.

Anyhow, it was my first time at the track...a lot of fun, and I was happy with my results. I can't wait for PROcede v2.0. :rocks:

btw -- my brother ran his Lotus Elise w/ Nitrous (and intake) and his best time was also 13.0xx sec., so I was just as fast as him with Nitrous and an intake.

Also, most of the other cars -- a GTO, VW GTIs, Mustang GTs, Acura/Honda ricers, etc. were all running in the 14's-15's; even a Mitsu Evo ran ~ 13.8sec.

RedGT3 · 06-23-2007, 11:21 AM

Good runs.

Ado · 06-23-2007, 11:28 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Cookiemonster

Here is mine stock exhaust and stock tires
I am right lane. CDV sucks. I removed that yesterday and will go to the track next Friday to take another shot.

Did you have your car dynoed after the PROCede?

What were your numbers on the dyno?

BMWPower06 · 06-23-2007, 03:13 PM

^^o i didnt notice u were proceded. In that case im upset at your time

musc · 06-23-2007, 03:21 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ado

Just got back from the track. I was actually hopping for a better time after seeing some of the times on DragTimes.com

60' 2.061
330 5.622
1/8 8.573
MPH 84.74
1000 11.061
1/4 13.201
MPH 106.24

The 2nd best was

13.349 @ 109.25 60' was 2.265

I can't get a good launch with these tires at all I got the 17" stock tires on so I'm not surprised that I can't get a good launch.

What kind of tires did some of you guys have on when you did the 1/4's ?

The 109 is good. Right on par with most everyone else.

Evo8MRto335I · 06-23-2007, 03:22 PM

ADO,

Is your car manual or auto?

Thanks!

RedGT3 · 06-23-2007, 03:42 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Evo8MRto335I

ADO,

Is your car manual or auto?

Thanks!

He's car is manual

Terry335 · 06-23-2007, 03:50 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by catm3

The 109 is good. Right on par with most everyone else.

What about the 106? 2mph faster than stock?

OpenFlash · 06-23-2007, 04:18 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Terry335

What about the 106? 2mph faster than stock?

It appears that few others have your acumen when it comes to consistency. In more ways than in just driving.
shiv

Terry335 · 06-23-2007, 04:29 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by shiv@vishnu

It appears that few others have your acumen when it comes to consistency. In more ways than in just driving.
shiv

Sounds like a case of spinning to MPH to me, or perhaps knock retard.

musc · 06-23-2007, 04:29 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Terry335

What about the 106? 2mph faster than stock?

Hard to say without knowing every detail of the run. It is rather easy to drop a few mph in a manual if you dont shift at the right rpm, slow with the shifting itself, etc. Sure he had a decent 60 foot, but could have easily messed something up in the rest of the run.

OpenFlash · 06-23-2007, 04:44 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Terry335

Sounds like a case of spinning to MPH to me, or perhaps knock retard.

Speak for yourself resistor man

06-23-2007, 01:05 AM	#1
Ado King Kong 59 Rep 771 Posts Drives: E92 M3 Join Date: Nov 2006 Location: Toronto iTrader: (0)	PROCeded 335i 1/4 Mile Time - Stock Tires, Stock Exhaust Just got back from the track. I was actually hopping for a better time after seeing some of the times on DragTimes.com 60' 2.061 330 5.622 1/8 8.573 MPH 84.74 1000 11.061 1/4 13.201 MPH 106.24 The 2nd best was 13.349 @ 109.25 60' was 2.265 I can't get a good launch with these tires at all I got the 17" stock tires on so I'm not surprised that I can't get a good launch. What kind of tires did some of you guys have on when you did the 1/4's ? __________________ 08 E92 M3 - AA ECU, AA Pulleys, AA Air Filter, AA Short Shifter - CURRENT E92 335i - Vishnu V3, Exhaust, Intake, BOV, CDV Delete - SOLD 1991 850i Dinan Twin Turbo - SOLD
	Appreciate 0 Tweet Quote

06-23-2007, 01:40 AM	#2
E90ice Banned 205 Rep 2,002 Posts Drives: 2008 335xi Coupe Join Date: May 2006 Location: WA iTrader: (0)	I'm no expert, but if you ask me, your 60' time isn't too great. What do you mean 17" tires? Do you have sport package?...mine are 18. __________________ Last edited by E90ice; 06-23-2007 at 02:04 PM..
	Appreciate 0 Quote

06-23-2007, 02:05 AM	#3
Ado King Kong 59 Rep 771 Posts Drives: E92 M3 Join Date: Nov 2006 Location: Toronto iTrader: (0)	No sport package. I got everything other then the sports package. I decided that I'd go with after market rims so I didn't want to spend the extra money on the sports package. I didn't really fancy the sports seats either. Although overall I think I should have gone with the Sports Package, had I known it would have come with an Oil cooler I would have been all over it. The 60' isn't too too bad but obviously with better tires I would have been able to launch the car better I think. __________________ 08 E92 M3 - AA ECU, AA Pulleys, AA Air Filter, AA Short Shifter - CURRENT E92 335i - Vishnu V3, Exhaust, Intake, BOV, CDV Delete - SOLD 1991 850i Dinan Twin Turbo - SOLD
	Appreciate 0 Quote

06-23-2007, 02:07 AM	#4
OpenFlash 1737 Rep 17,960 Posts Drives: A Lot Join Date: Sep 2006 Location: SF Bay, CA iTrader: (0) Garage List 2018 Ducati Panigal ... [0.00] 2016 Mazda CX5 [0.00] 2017 Aprilia Tuono ... [0.00] 2019 BMW M2 Competi ... [0.00] 2015 BMW M5 Competi ... [10.00] 2016 Ducati XDiavel S [0.00] 2016 AMG GT S [0.00] 2011 Ferrari 458 It ... [0.00] 2017 Charger Hellcat [0.00] 2015 KTM Super Duke ... [0.00] 2016 KTM RC390 [0.00]	109.25mph. Good trap speed for an otherwise stock car!
	Appreciate 0 Quote

06-23-2007, 02:15 AM	#5
BMWPower06 A^M=G is nothing w/o the Power of ///M 171 Rep 1,816 Posts Drives: ///M5 & ///M3 Join Date: Jan 2007 Location: Washington D.C. iTrader: (0)	WOW 13.2 with a 2 second 60 foot, makes me wonder how the procede guys are getting 13.0 with their 2 second 60 foot. __________________ Indianapolis Red BMW ///M5
	Appreciate 0 Quote

06-23-2007, 02:25 AM	#6
Ado King Kong 59 Rep 771 Posts Drives: E92 M3 Join Date: Nov 2006 Location: Toronto iTrader: (0)	^ Yeah it's interesting but I am noticing a better trap speed for some of them. Here is Shiv's run as an example from DragTimes.com 111.177 8.664 86.770 2.227 13.195 @ 111.177 where his 60' was 2.227 Then again he did have his exhaust on and dynoed @ i think 20 more HP then me. I think he may have been on 18"s though not sure. __________________ 08 E92 M3 - AA ECU, AA Pulleys, AA Air Filter, AA Short Shifter - CURRENT E92 335i - Vishnu V3, Exhaust, Intake, BOV, CDV Delete - SOLD 1991 850i Dinan Twin Turbo - SOLD
	Appreciate 0 Quote

06-23-2007, 07:26 AM	#7
hotrod2448 grand poobah 254 Rep 2,253 Posts Drives: F80 M3, F10 535i Join Date: Dec 2006 Location: Charlotte, NC iTrader: (0) Garage List 2011 335d [0.00]	Right lane?
	Appreciate 0 Quote

06-23-2007, 07:51 AM	#8
rallycobra Private First Class 14 Rep 135 Posts Drives: 2008 M3 Join Date: Apr 2007 Location: Central NJ iTrader: (1)	If you had drag radials and maybe a lsd, your 60' would be about a 1.8". Every tenth you save on the 60' is worth about 2 tenths at the end of the track. You could have easily run a 12.8 @109 with traction. A trap speed of 109mph with a stock exhaust is awsome! You are making tons of power.
	Appreciate 0 Quote

06-23-2007, 07:59 AM	#9
max boost Lieutenant 40 Rep 408 Posts Drives: 07 335i Join Date: Nov 2006 Location: east side iTrader: (1)	i ran a 12.7X w/procede and stock tires...killer da on an other day, with bfg dr i went a 12.54....horrible da
	Appreciate 0 Quote

06-23-2007, 09:26 AM	#11
sflgator Major General 148 Rep 5,389 Posts Drives: '09 MB C63 AMG & '08 MB GL450 Join Date: Oct 2006 Location: U.S. iTrader: (1)	OK...so I went to my local 1/4 mi. track last night too. I got in 6 runs. I hardly spun my wheels/tires at all, but I have 19" Mich PS2s. What a fun time; my best time was 13.097 sec. @ 106.67mph (w/ a 60ft. time of 1.977 sec.). My fastest trap speed was 107.29mph, but on that run, I did 13.171sec. I know I could get into the high 12's (~ 12.8-12.9 sec.) with better weather and track conditions...it was 84 degrees F w/ ~ 65% R.H...the air was so thick last night, you could cut it with a knife. I'll scan in and post up my best timeslip next week. In regards to my Beltronics FX2 -- I tested it last night at the track, and it was off by less than 2/10ths of a sec., but.....it was SLOWER than my actual track time. So, Kujo is right and wrong, at least for MY specific FX2 unit. It showed 13.2 sec. when the track timeslip shows 13.097 sec. Anyhow, it was my first time at the track...a lot of fun, and I was happy with my results. I can't wait for PROcede v2.0. :rocks: btw -- my brother ran his Lotus Elise w/ Nitrous (and intake) and his best time was also 13.0xx sec., so I was just as fast as him with Nitrous and an intake. Also, most of the other cars -- a GTO, VW GTIs, Mustang GTs, Acura/Honda ricers, etc. were all running in the 14's-15's; even a Mitsu Evo ran ~ 13.8sec. __________________ \|2009 RENNtech MB C63 AMG \| Black/Black Leather/Black Maple \| Premium II \| MultiMedia \| iPod \| \| TeleAid \| Charcoal Filter Delete \| BMC High-Flow Air Filters \| High-Flow Secondary Cats \| Clear Side Markers \| Last edited by sflgator; 06-23-2007 at 12:13 PM..
	Appreciate 0 Quote

06-23-2007, 11:21 AM	#12
RedGT3 Major 76 Rep 1,253 Posts Drives: .2 GT3/M3cs Join Date: Jun 2007 Location: FL iTrader: (3)	Good runs.
	Appreciate 0 Quote

06-23-2007, 03:13 PM	#14
BMWPower06 A^M=G is nothing w/o the Power of ///M 171 Rep 1,816 Posts Drives: ///M5 & ///M3 Join Date: Jan 2007 Location: Washington D.C. iTrader: (0)	^^o i didnt notice u were proceded. In that case im upset at your time __________________ Indianapolis Red BMW ///M5
	Appreciate 0 Quote

06-23-2007, 03:22 PM	#16
Evo8MRto335I Captain 40 Rep 983 Posts Drives: can't list them all Join Date: Feb 2007 Location: Tucson iTrader: (1)	ADO, Is your car manual or auto? Thanks!
	Appreciate 0 Quote