M5POST
BMW Garage BMW Meets Register Today's Posts

Go Back   M5POST - BMW M5 Forum > F10 M5 Forum > M5 versus...

Post Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
      12-06-2011, 10:06 AM   #1
Jason
Administrator
Jason's Avatar
United_States
40719
Rep
21,238
Posts

Drives: F80 M3
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: USA

iTrader: (0)

Cool Drag Race Video: F10 M5 vs Panamera S vs E63 vs XFR

BIMMERPOST NEWS
Drag Race Video: F10 M5 vs Panamera S vs E63 vs XFR
84
COMMENTS

EVO has gathered the brutes of the executive sedan category - the F10 M5, Porsche Panamera S, E63 AMG w/ performance package, and Jaguar XFR, and gathered them for a group test.

To whet our appetite for their full review, they've released a drag race clip featuring all four cars. For reference, the cars feature:

M5 - 560hp / 501 lb-ft tq (4.4L turbo V8)
Panamera S - 400hp / 369 ft-lbs tq (4.8L V8)
E63 AMG w/ performance package - 550hp / 590lbft (5.5L V8)
XFR - 510hp / 461 ft-lbs tq (5.0L V8)

Drag results in the video!



Appreciate 0
      12-06-2011, 11:21 AM   #2
wolfmobil
Private
wolfmobil's Avatar
58
Rep
71
Posts

Drives: Horse
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Earth

iTrader: (0)

Not a very fair line up. They should have had a Panamera Turbo instead of just S. Porsche was the only NA car in the race. Other had forced induction.
Appreciate 0
      12-06-2011, 12:48 PM   #3
phish_100
First Lieutenant
United Kingdom
17
Rep
300
Posts

Drives: Azurite Black F10M M5
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: London

iTrader: (0)

The turbo is a massively different price range. The m5 easily wins this competition.
Appreciate 0
      12-06-2011, 01:44 PM   #4
-=Hot|Ice=-
Been There, Done That.
-=Hot|Ice=-'s Avatar
United_States
648
Rep
4,728
Posts

Drives: 2013 BMW M3
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Maryland

iTrader: (0)

Here's the full article:



__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jaypod View Post
You sound like my buddies who have AMG's - Slam the gas, slam the brakes...
Appreciate 0
      12-06-2011, 01:50 PM   #5
-=Hot|Ice=-
Been There, Done That.
-=Hot|Ice=-'s Avatar
United_States
648
Rep
4,728
Posts

Drives: 2013 BMW M3
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Maryland

iTrader: (0)





__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jaypod View Post
You sound like my buddies who have AMG's - Slam the gas, slam the brakes...
Appreciate 0
      12-06-2011, 01:54 PM   #6
-=Hot|Ice=-
Been There, Done That.
-=Hot|Ice=-'s Avatar
United_States
648
Rep
4,728
Posts

Drives: 2013 BMW M3
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Maryland

iTrader: (0)


__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jaypod View Post
You sound like my buddies who have AMG's - Slam the gas, slam the brakes...
Appreciate 0
      12-06-2011, 03:08 PM   #7
M-Power111
First Lieutenant
M-Power111's Avatar
United_States
3
Rep
398
Posts

Drives: Not a BMW....yet
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Clearwater, FL USA

iTrader: (0)

nice, no contest. again V-10 who??
__________________

BMW=
Appreciate 0
      12-06-2011, 03:14 PM   #8
Kinder
Private
Kinder's Avatar
France
0
Rep
60
Posts

Drives: E39 M5 / Stolen&burned down :(
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: North

iTrader: (0)

The E63 had the AMG Performance Package Plus in this test (550hp/590lbft)
Appreciate 0
      12-06-2011, 03:29 PM   #9
Q4P
Colonel
Q4P's Avatar
United_States
83
Rep
2,291
Posts

Drives: Too Much
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: World

iTrader: (0)

Very nice win by the M5 but let's remember the Porsche only lost because of its price and it was the only NA contender in this race.

A Panamera Turbo would have mowed this competition; a Turbo S would have slaughtered it.
__________________
2jZ + RB26 + 4G63 + LS9 + N54 =
Appreciate 0
      12-06-2011, 03:31 PM   #10
M-Power111
First Lieutenant
M-Power111's Avatar
United_States
3
Rep
398
Posts

Drives: Not a BMW....yet
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Clearwater, FL USA

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by Questforpower View Post
Very nice win by the M5 but let's remember the Porsche only lost because of its price and it was the only NA contender in this race.

A Panamera Turbo would have mowed this competition; a Turbo S would have slaughtered it.
yeah but its ugly.
__________________

BMW=
Appreciate 0
      12-06-2011, 03:32 PM   #11
Reckamech
Master of Disaster
Reckamech's Avatar
United_States
33
Rep
136
Posts

Drives: 2014 X5 Sport
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Dallas,TX

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by wolfbimmer View Post
Not a very fair line up. They should have had a Panamera Turbo instead of just S. Porsche was the only NA car in the race. Other had forced induction.
Price point may have been the key here.
Appreciate 0
      12-06-2011, 03:32 PM   #12
Q4P
Colonel
Q4P's Avatar
United_States
83
Rep
2,291
Posts

Drives: Too Much
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: World

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by M-Power111 View Post
yeah but its ugly.
This is true but the interior quality of materials makes its competition look like civics (BMW included).
__________________
2jZ + RB26 + 4G63 + LS9 + N54 =
Appreciate 0
      12-06-2011, 03:50 PM   #13
Wolf
Captain
Wolf's Avatar
Lebanon
228
Rep
876
Posts

Drives: on hold
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Earth

iTrader: (0)

thanks HotIce.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by bimmerjph View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by SCOTT26 View Post
BMW have tapped into this by mirroring typical BMW dynamics and steering communication within the new UKL cars.
You mean massive body roll, a steering system that is not connected to the front wheels, and the engine note played through the speaker system?!?!?!?!
Appreciate 0
      12-06-2011, 03:59 PM   #14
TheBingoBalls
Brigadier General
TheBingoBalls's Avatar
Canada
3817
Rep
4,657
Posts

Drives: BMW
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Toronto, Ontario

iTrader: (1)

Garage List
Does the M Drivers Package do anything in terms of performance or does it just allow the M5 to reach 190mph+?
Appreciate 0
      12-06-2011, 04:01 PM   #15
Just_me
Captain
196
Rep
657
Posts

Drives: RWD
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Sweden

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by Questforpower View Post
A Panamera Turbo would have mowed this competition; a Turbo S would have slaughtered it.
No slaughter at all. I read a comparison between M5 and Panamera Turbo S and Porsche was only 0.01 seconds quicker than M5 to 200km/h.
So I wouldnt use the word slaughter.
Appreciate 0
      12-06-2011, 04:02 PM   #16
Just_me
Captain
196
Rep
657
Posts

Drives: RWD
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Sweden

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by 宝马.e90 View Post
Does the M Drivers Package do anything in terms of performance or does it just allow the M5 to reach 190mph+?
Only topspeed.
Appreciate 0
      12-06-2011, 04:06 PM   #17
Q4P
Colonel
Q4P's Avatar
United_States
83
Rep
2,291
Posts

Drives: Too Much
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: World

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by Just_me View Post
No slaughter at all. I read a comparison between M5 and Panamera Turbo S and Porsche was only 0.01 seconds quicker than M5 to 200km/h.
So I wouldnt use the word slaughter.
I don't know; the Panamera is AWD... off the line it should leave those other three. I would still get the M5 solely on a excellent all together package including great looks.
__________________
2jZ + RB26 + 4G63 + LS9 + N54 =
Appreciate 0
      12-06-2011, 04:07 PM   #18
JohnSprm69
Colonel
162
Rep
2,007
Posts

Drives: AW e92
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Miami, FL

iTrader: (4)

Quote:
Originally Posted by M-Power111 View Post
yeah but its ugly.
i have to disagree with you, that car is tits all around, specially inside that it looks like a plane.
Appreciate 0
      12-06-2011, 04:08 PM   #19
wisesoul
Savoir Faire
wisesoul's Avatar
Philippines
74
Rep
1,772
Posts

Drives: 2013 BMW M5
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Los Angeles, Ca

iTrader: (0)

M5 spanked them on the drag and track. What more can we ask for? Except for an option to remove the active sound. What if the owner wants an aftermarket exhaust? The cabin will sound the exact same!!
__________________
Current: Alpine White F10 M5|H&R springs|12mm/10mm spacers|Eisenmann Race
Sold:Imola Yellow RS4-KW V3|MTM 10mm spacers|Hotchkis rear sway bar|APR Stage 1|Milltek Catless|RNS-E|Euro RS4 Flat bottom Steering Wheel
Sold:E46 323i
Appreciate 0
      12-06-2011, 04:09 PM   #20
bimmerjph
Colonel
bimmerjph's Avatar
United_States
121
Rep
2,023
Posts

Drives: 2005 Z4 3.0
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Tennessee

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by Questforpower View Post
Very nice win by the M5 but let's remember the Porsche only lost because of its price and it was the only NA contender in this race.

A Panamera Turbo would have mowed this competition; a Turbo S would have slaughtered it.
I dont think a Panamera Turbo would win. It has 55 less horsepower and weighs about 100 pounds more. And it has all wheel drive, which means understeer.

And as others said its stupid ugly.

So
Appreciate 0
      12-06-2011, 04:11 PM   #21
AlterZgo
Lieutenant Colonel
1538
Rep
1,665
Posts

Drives: 23 X3 M40i, 21 911S, 24 Taycan
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Gilbert, AZ

iTrader: (0)

Though the M5 was quickest, looks like the M5's acceleration figures in this test were not as good as in the C&D test. In the C&D test, the M5 ran the 1/4 mile in 12.0 @ 122 mph and hit 150 mph in 18.3 seconds.
Appreciate 0
      12-06-2011, 04:21 PM   #22
Groundhog
Private
3
Rep
84
Posts

Drives: R-compounded
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: West Coast

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by Questforpower View Post
Very nice win by the M5 but let's remember the Porsche only lost because of its price and it was the only NA contender in this race.

A Panamera Turbo would have mowed this competition; a Turbo S would have slaughtered it.
http://www.evo.co.uk/carreviews/carg...aguar_xfr.html

I didn't read the whole article but if I'm reading the this chart right, it looks like the m5 would come from behind.

LAP TIMES
Performance Panamera QP XFR
0-30 1.4 2 2.1
0-40 2 2.9 2.9
0-50 2.6 4 3.8
0-60 3.6 5.1 4.8
0-70 4.7 6.7 5.9
0-80 5.8 8.3 7.3
0-90 7.3 10.2 8.9
0-100 8.9 12.1 10.2
0-110 10.7 14.8 12.3
0-120 12.9 17.9 14.5
0-130 15.6 21.4 17
0-14018.8 -- 20.3
0-15022.7 -- 24.5
1/4 mile sec 12 13.6 13
1/4 mile mph 116.3 105.9 113
Braking 0-100 sec 4.6 4.3 4.5
Braking 0-100 ft 304 319.4 309.3
0-100-0 sec 14.2 16.9 15.3

2009 article. If 2012 Pcar has HP bump, then maybe it's as fast now.
Appreciate 0
Post Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:54 AM.




m5post
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
1Addicts.com, BIMMERPOST.com, E90Post.com, F30Post.com, M3Post.com, ZPost.com, 5Post.com, 6Post.com, 7Post.com, XBimmers.com logo and trademark are properties of BIMMERPOST