E90Post
 


Coby Wheel
 
BMW 3-Series (E90 E92) Forum > E90 / E92 / E93 3-series Powertrain and Drivetrain Discussions > N54 Turbo Engine / Drivetrain / Exhaust Modifications - 335i > AFR Comparo (Procede/JB4/Cobb)



Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
      11-16-2011, 02:19 PM   #1
OpenFlash
United_States
1750
Rep
17,960
Posts

Drives: A Lot
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: SF Bay, CA

iTrader: (0)

Garage List
AFR Comparo (Procede/JB4/Cobb)

Hi guys,
Last week, a few forum members had a dyno day in Las Vegas. Among the cars were 3 n54s. All 3 were FBO (or close to it). I was not present but I did ask to have all the dyno data sent to me so I could make this interesting same dyno/same day comparison. This isn't a hp comparison as the Procede car was running meth. But it does present a good opportunity to compare AFR targets. The Procede car (and perhaps the Cobb one as well?) were running stock secondary cats so AFR readings will read slightly leaner than actual. The Jb4 car was running completely catless so there should be no catalyst induced misreading. All 4th gear runs. AFR was measured at the tailpipe with fresh Dynojet AFR sensor.



Car 1
335
Procede Rev2.5
11-1 Stg 3
PWM Meth kit
FBO w/stock exhaust

Car 2
335
Cobb AP
Stg 2 map
100oct
FBO w/stock exhaust

Car 3
135
BMS JB4
Map 7
FBO
100oct

Appreciate 0
      11-16-2011, 02:26 PM   #2
frank35
Private
14
Rep
88
Posts

Drives: 335I JB3 DCI
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: SF

iTrader: (0)

I saw the option of playing the fuel and boost the JB4 map6 of that new fuel values ​​you have changed?
Appreciate 0
      11-16-2011, 02:32 PM   #3
Jeff@TopGearSolutions
Jeff@TopGearSolutions's Avatar
United_States
3442
Rep
79,211
Posts

Drives: C6 Z06, 09 335i, 10 335xi
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: www.TopGearSolutions.com

iTrader: (37)

People that have a Cobb must be rich
Appreciate 0
      11-16-2011, 02:37 PM   #4
vase330
Colonel
vase330's Avatar
United_States
103
Rep
2,760
Posts

Drives: 19 E63S; 15.5 RangeRover ATB
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Arlington, Va

iTrader: (1)

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jeff@topgearsolutions View Post
People that have a Cobb must be rich
?? Missed that part of the joke. Why do you say this?
__________________
E92 335 | Space Gray | Saddle Brown Dakota | Dark Burl Trim | ZPP | ZSP | AT | Idrive | 6FL | FBO | Dinan CAI | Quaife LSD | STG3 PROCede.
Appreciate 0
      11-16-2011, 02:44 PM   #5
FirstBMWLA
Major
FirstBMWLA's Avatar
188
Rep
1,105
Posts

Drives: 2007 335i Coupe
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Dallas,TX

iTrader: (11)

Quote:
Originally Posted by vase330 View Post
?? Missed that part of the joke. Why do you say this?
Cause it's running rich burning more fuel more $$ I would guess

I see this becoming flame thread of the week. We're due for another I guess...

Appreciate 0
      11-16-2011, 02:47 PM   #6
OpenFlash
United_States
1750
Rep
17,960
Posts

Drives: A Lot
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: SF Bay, CA

iTrader: (0)

Garage List
Quote:
Originally Posted by FirstBMWLA View Post
Cause it's running rich burning more fuel more $$ I would guess

I see this becoming flame thread of the week. We're due for another I guess...

There is absolutely no reason for this thread to turn into a flame war. In fact, the owners of the cars are more than welcome to add whatever info they think is relevant to this thread (specific mods, car details, etc,.). Tuners are welcome to participate as well.

Shiv
Appreciate 0
      11-16-2011, 02:52 PM   #7
Glowin
Captain
Glowin's Avatar
United_States
73
Rep
978
Posts

Drives: X3 35 & 335i now - M2/M4 next?
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Seattle

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by shiv@vishnu View Post
Hi guys,
Last week, a few forum members had a dyno day in Las Vegas. Among the cars were 3 n54s. All 3 were FBO (or close to it). I was not present but I did ask to have all the dyno data sent to me so I could make this interesting same dyno/same day comparison. This isn't a hp comparison as the Procede car was running meth. But it does present a good opportunity to compare AFR targets. The Procede car (and perhaps the Cobb one as well?) were running stock secondary cats so AFR readings will read slightly leaner than actual. The Jb4 car was running completely catless so there should be no catalyst induced misreading. All 4th gear runs. AFR was measured at the tailpipe with fresh Dynojet AFR sensor.

Car 1
335
Procede Rev2.5
11-1 Stg 3
PWM Meth kit
FBO w/stock exhaust

Car 2
335
Cobb AP
Stg 2 map
100oct
FBO w/stock exhaust

Car 3
135
BMS JB4
Map 7
FBO
100oct

And? I don't understand the point of the thread. Are we supposed to draw some conclusion?

As I read in a book, "Without analysis, raw data are left open to uninformed interpretation."
Appreciate 0
      11-16-2011, 02:55 PM   #8
ExpensiveTaste
Poor Kid with Dreams
ExpensiveTaste's Avatar
United_States
28
Rep
702
Posts

Drives: BSM 07 E90 335xi
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Danbury, CT

iTrader: (4)

Too many factors for this thread to mean anything at all. Get a wideband sensor bung welded into the exhaust where there is still heat, test the same model car, with same mods (other than tune), with same conditions, and then it might be of some use at all...
__________________

'07 BSM 335xi JB4, DCI, CX Racing I/C, ER Chargepipe, Meth, KW V3 - Pending Sale
'95 Mustang GTS 347ci Ported TFS TW Heads,Custom Cam,Victor 5.0 IM,Tubular Front Suspension,Full Exhaust,Big and Littles
Appreciate 0
      11-16-2011, 02:56 PM   #9
thebigragu99
Banned
47
Rep
828
Posts

Drives: 135 tuorbbo
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: nyc

iTrader: (1)

Quote:
Originally Posted by FirstBMWLA View Post
Cause it's running rich burning more fuel more $$ I would guess

I see this becoming flame thread of the week. We're due for another I guess...

No,it means that the arfs are richer..

Shiv the comparison is not completey fair,they not all the same fuels.
Appreciate 0
      11-16-2011, 03:03 PM   #10
Joshboody
Lieutenant Colonel
65
Rep
1,708
Posts

Drives: pickemuptruck
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Phoenix, AZ

iTrader: (7)

Fuel type won't make a difference as far as i know.

Any datalogs to match up?
Appreciate 0
      11-16-2011, 03:05 PM   #11
OpenFlash
United_States
1750
Rep
17,960
Posts

Drives: A Lot
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: SF Bay, CA

iTrader: (0)

Garage List
Quote:
Originally Posted by Joshboody View Post
Fuel type won't make a difference as far as i know.

Any datalogs to match up?
Correct. Fuel type won't make a difference to the test. And since all three cars had plenty of octane, they wouldn't run into knock-induced AFR richening. The Procede car took logs. Not sure about the other two. The owners would have to chime in on that if they wanted to.

shiv
Appreciate 0
      11-16-2011, 03:05 PM   #12
thebigragu99
Banned
47
Rep
828
Posts

Drives: 135 tuorbbo
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: nyc

iTrader: (1)

Quote:
Originally Posted by Joshboody View Post
Fuel type won't make a difference as far as i know.

Any datalogs to match up?
it would.
Appreciate 0
      11-16-2011, 03:08 PM   #13
Mike@N54Tuning.com
Joint Chiefs of Staff
Canada
4927
Rep
116,037
Posts

Drives: 2007 335i, 2015 M3
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: N54tuning.com

iTrader: (89)

Quote:
Originally Posted by Joshboody View Post
Fuel type won't make a difference as far as i know.

Any datalogs to match up?
Running methanol enables you to basically hit any air/fuel ratio you want provided the o2_biasing resistors are properly sized. You bypass the whole fuel trims issue that everyone not on methanol is dealing with. Not sure what the point of this comparison is either.

Mike
Appreciate 0
      11-16-2011, 03:10 PM   #14
MAC335i
First Lieutenant
19
Rep
301
Posts

Drives: 2007 Jet Black E90 335i
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: California

iTrader: (12)

I think its kinda obvious... The Cobb and JB4 both have a bump up in AFR and the procede does not.

I think he is showing how the procede controls fuel/targets AFRs "differently" (read: "better") than other tunes.

amirite
Appreciate 0
      11-16-2011, 03:14 PM   #15
OpenFlash
United_States
1750
Rep
17,960
Posts

Drives: A Lot
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: SF Bay, CA

iTrader: (0)

Garage List
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mike@N54Tuning.com View Post
Running methanol enables you to basically hit any air/fuel ratio you want provided the o2_biasing resistors are properly sized. You bypass the whole fuel trims issue that everyone not on methanol is dealing with. Not sure what the point of this comparison is either.

Mike
Incorrect Terry. Running methanol will allow you to hit the AFR targets but will require less additive fuel trim (all other things equal). The only time running meth will allow you to hit your AFR targets is if running without meth results in max'd out fuel trims. Which is not the case here.
Appreciate 0
      11-16-2011, 03:14 PM   #16
Joshboody
Lieutenant Colonel
65
Rep
1,708
Posts

Drives: pickemuptruck
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Phoenix, AZ

iTrader: (7)

Quote:
Originally Posted by thebigragu99 View Post
it would.
explain? My understanding is that WB measures the amount of oxygen added or removed from stoich. This means fuel type would not matter.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mike@N54Tuning.com View Post
Running methanol enables you to basically hit any air/fuel ratio you want provided the o2_biasing resistors are properly sized. You bypass the whole fuel trims issue that everyone not on methanol is dealing with. Not sure what the point of this comparison is either.

Mike
Nobody should be maxing trims, since all tunes have the ability to alter fuel requirements. If AFR improves on meth, then off-meth tuning is not configured correctly.
Appreciate 0
      11-16-2011, 03:15 PM   #17
thebigragu99
Banned
47
Rep
828
Posts

Drives: 135 tuorbbo
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: nyc

iTrader: (1)

Quote:
Originally Posted by mikeclark111 View Post
I think its kinda obvious... The Cobb and JB4 both have a bump up in AFR and the procede does not.

I think he is showing how the procede controls fuel/targets AFRs "differently" (read: "better") than other tunes.

amirite
Actually,the v3 is all over the place from going to rich,then lean,and back to rich again.
Appreciate 0
      11-16-2011, 03:16 PM   #18
OpenFlash
United_States
1750
Rep
17,960
Posts

Drives: A Lot
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: SF Bay, CA

iTrader: (0)

Garage List
Quote:
Originally Posted by Joshboody View Post
explain? My understanding is that WB measures the amount of oxygen added or removed from stoich. This means fuel type would not matter.


Nobody should be maxing trims, since all tunes have the ability to alter fuel requirements. If AFR improves on meth, then off-meth tuning is not configured correctly.
Correct on both accounts.
Appreciate 0
      11-16-2011, 03:36 PM   #19
vasillalov
Mad Linux Guru On The Loose
vasillalov's Avatar
1130
Rep
5,400
Posts

Drives: 2008 335i Sedan, 2023 M3
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Chicago, IL

iTrader: (5)

Garage List
2023 BMW M3  [0.00]
2008 335i E90  [8.00]
Ok,

So now that we have AFR logs from three cars with somewhat similar mods, the following question must be answered:

What is considered a proper AFR for this DI engine across the different rpm ranges? Why?
__________________
Appreciate 0
      11-16-2011, 03:38 PM   #20
vasillalov
Mad Linux Guru On The Loose
vasillalov's Avatar
1130
Rep
5,400
Posts

Drives: 2008 335i Sedan, 2023 M3
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Chicago, IL

iTrader: (5)

Garage List
2023 BMW M3  [0.00]
2008 335i E90  [8.00]
Also, for the sake of comparison, here is a bone stock dyno showing stock AFRs:

__________________
Appreciate 0
      11-16-2011, 03:46 PM   #21
RambleJ
Colonel
RambleJ's Avatar
No_Country
60
Rep
2,014
Posts

Drives: F10 535i M-sport
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Back in teh so cal

iTrader: (2)

For this to be a true comparo, all the cars would need to be in the same fuel type. Either all meth/pump or all 100oct. This is worthless.
Appreciate 0
      11-16-2011, 03:48 PM   #22
Mike@N54Tuning.com
Joint Chiefs of Staff
Canada
4927
Rep
116,037
Posts

Drives: 2007 335i, 2015 M3
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: N54tuning.com

iTrader: (89)

Quote:
Originally Posted by Joshboody View Post
explain? My understanding is that WB measures the amount of oxygen added or removed from stoich. This means fuel type would not matter.


Nobody should be maxing trims, since all tunes have the ability to alter fuel requirements. If AFR improves on meth, then off-meth tuning is not configured correctly.
It's very easy to max out trims down low on a race gas map. Of course the fuel pressure mapping (FPMapping variable in the JB4) determines the open loop fueling and fuel trims. The fuel table determines the AFR target or o2_bias. If I were offering advice to whomever did the JB4 run I would suggest they increase the fuel pressure mapping as it looks like they are maxing out the fuel trims on spool up. In one of the newer beta firmwares that system has actually been redesigned and fuel trims added as a loggable parameter. Now if they are running meth they can go 100 all across on the fuel table to run as rich as they want without much worry of maxing out the fuel trims on stock turbos.

Mike
Appreciate 0
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:52 AM.




e90post
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
1Addicts.com, BIMMERPOST.com, E90Post.com, F30Post.com, M3Post.com, ZPost.com, 5Post.com, 6Post.com, 7Post.com, XBimmers.com logo and trademark are properties of BIMMERPOST