|
|
|
|
|
|
BMW Garage | BMW Meets | Register | Today's Posts | Search |
|
BMW 3-Series (E90 E92) Forum
>
ACN91 Mapping how does it compare to the original 91 Map?
|
|
05-01-2011, 12:02 AM | #1 |
First Lieutenant
24
Rep 330
Posts |
ACN91 Mapping how does it compare to the original 91 Map?
Wondering if anyone has changed over to the new ACN91 map?
Is there much difference? |
05-01-2011, 10:35 AM | #3 | |
First Lieutenant
24
Rep 330
Posts |
Quote:
I use only Shell 91 and the car seems to like it. Let me know what happens when you run the data logs. Thanks |
|
Appreciate
0
|
05-02-2011, 12:01 AM | #4 | |
Captain
62
Rep 840
Posts |
Quote:
Here's a data log with the standard 2.02 ACN91 map, 3rd gear pull. I don't want to try to change the map right now because my AP goes into recovery mode every time I try. There is still a bug with some 2007 models. |
|
Appreciate
0
|
05-02-2011, 09:33 AM | #5 | |
First Lieutenant
24
Rep 330
Posts |
Quote:
How does it look to you? How does this compare to the original Stage 1 - 91 log? |
|
Appreciate
0
|
05-04-2011, 10:01 PM | #6 |
Captain
62
Rep 840
Posts |
Here's my 3rd gear datalog with 91 Octane 2.02 Standard maps (non-ACN). I have no mods other than the tune. I had to slow down at 5,500 rpm.
I'm not an expert, but based on what I learned on this forum, it looks good to me. The timing is really low compared to piggybacks, but that's how Cobb prefers to tune the car. |
Appreciate
0
|
05-04-2011, 10:38 PM | #7 | |
First Lieutenant
24
Rep 330
Posts |
Quote:
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
Bookmarks |
|
|