|
|
|
|
|
|
BMW Garage | BMW Meets | Register | Today's Posts | Search |
|
BMW 3-Series (E90 E92) Forum
>
Drvetrain Loss and Weight
|
|
12-06-2008, 09:49 AM | #2 |
Moderator
618
Rep 10,855
Posts |
Approx. 11.6% (Dinan has good data on this)
Guess 3410 dry
__________________
My recent ED photos: http://f80.bimmerpost.com/forums/sho....php?t=1026808
my not-so-recent ED: http://www.e90post.com/forums/showthread.php?t=31829 Please join BMWCCA http://bmwcca.org/index.php?pageid=c...&ref_by=300279 |
Appreciate
0
|
12-06-2008, 10:00 AM | #3 | |
ahat
1036
Rep 2,592
Posts |
Quote:
Weight is around 3550 with about 1/2 tank of fuel.
__________________
'13 335IS N54 (1 of 373 LeMans Blue out of 3597 total production e92)- Grey interior (1 of 24 in LMB with any trans- 1 of 14 with DCT)-MODS -MFactory LSD/MHD-BQ custom Tune/ATM-IC/AFE Momentum GT Intake/Konis/Mfront&HeimJoint Rear rods&arms/Brembos. https://photos.app.goo.gl/Lo6aHZRo7XqtPkhL8 |
|
Appreciate
0
|
12-06-2008, 11:02 AM | #4 |
Custom Powder Coater
147
Rep 2,784
Posts |
Don't most automatic RWD cars lose around 20% through the drivetrain?
340HP - 20% loss = 272 RWHP 330HP - 15% loss - 270 RWHP Curb Weight = 3582 (Not sure what options on the car) Curb Weight includes a full galon of tank, and I think a 75KG Driver (at least in Europe, and the car is made in Europe so I dunno...) Tank = 16 Gallons 1 Gallon of Gasoline = 6lbs So Curb Weight = 3580 Driver 165 lbs Full Tank of fuel = 95lbs 3580 - 165 - 95 = 3320 Without Driver or Fuel (But again I don't know if Curb Weight includes the 75kg driver like it might in Europe)
__________________
|
Appreciate
0
|
12-06-2008, 11:04 AM | #5 |
Major General
363
Rep 5,873
Posts
Drives: m
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: usa
|
So does awd have more or less drivetrain loss?
__________________
|
Appreciate
0
|
12-06-2008, 11:25 AM | #6 |
Lieutenant
235
Rep 506
Posts |
Thanks all. AWD typically has a bit more loss due to the fact that the power is being routed to four wheels as opposed to two. There are more parts for the power to be transferred from the engine to wheels; resulting in a greater loss.
|
Appreciate
0
|
12-06-2008, 06:47 PM | #7 |
Major
36
Rep 1,467
Posts |
AWD is a mixed bag.
you may lose about 12% in RWD, and 18% in AWD... So you have : 88% remaining that goes to the wheels 82% remaining that goes to the wheels But if you can torque 50% more before you break traction, you still get better performance from AWD. AWD's advantage is at low speeds when you have the torque available to break traction. At higher speeds where this isn't an issue, RWD will be better since only the drive train loss matters. Unless you have massive power, most cars will benefit from AWD from 0-20 or so (depends on your power, though. More power = AWD helps longer.). -scheherazade |
Appreciate
0
|
Bookmarks |
|
|