02-18-2020, 06:54 AM | #1 |
General
17501
Rep 25,121
Posts |
Wow these new figures are harsh/very real.
Out of interest I looked up my X3 M40D with the new figures. 37.2 - 39.2Mpg As usual the lower figures would be with the bigger wheels etc. After 19,000 I'm at an average mpg of 40.4!!! Thus moving forwards with my journey types it looks like I can realistically expect to achieve and actually better WLTP.
__________________
My car made front page of Bimmerpost
Last edited by JustChris; 02-18-2020 at 09:37 AM.. |
02-19-2020, 05:40 AM | #2 |
Major
606
Rep 1,455
Posts |
I checked the WLTP figures for my 520i, there are lots of different figures to choose from
The combined figure of 39.2mpg is pretty much what I get, in fact 42.2 is what the idrive reports although I'd guess the idrive will probably be a bit more optimistic than the real figure So it seems WLTP figures are at least representative |
Appreciate
1
JustChris17500.50 |
02-19-2020, 07:11 AM | #3 | |
Banned
4280
Rep 7,703
Posts |
Quote:
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
02-19-2020, 07:36 AM | #4 | ||
General
17501
Rep 25,121
Posts |
Quote:
__________________
My car made front page of Bimmerpost
|
||
Appreciate
1
Goneinsixtyseconds4279.50 |
02-19-2020, 01:20 PM | #5 | ||
King of the North (living in the east...)
1058
Rep 2,158
Posts |
Quote:
The only thing that is amazing is that the 40i was so frugal (for a petrol).
__________________
2021 M340i in mineral white, options galore
Previously 2018 440i GC in MG 2015 330D F30 MSport EBII 2012 Alfa Guilietta 2.0d Veloce 2009 Fiat bravo sport 2000 ST Mondeo |
||
Appreciate
0
|
02-19-2020, 03:25 PM | #6 |
Captain
470
Rep 786
Posts
Drives: 2018 F80 M3 CP YMB
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: United Kingdom
|
I just did 355 miles in my M3CP and used 50.7l so 31.8mpg. That was mainly M-way at a cruise speed I won't put in print, but also driving in and out of Manchester and in and out of Newcastle including 45 mins of stop start. WLTP for combined is 30.4 so a much better guide than the elusive 34mpg - normally my average is around 27 - still good for wide tyres and 450hp that begs to be used...
__________________
Current: 2018 F80 M3CP YMB. Previous: 2015: F34 335d GT M Sport+; 2012: F07 535d GT M Sport; 2008: 335d SE; 2005: 530d; 2003: 330d; 2002: 330i; 1999: 523i
|
02-19-2020, 03:47 PM | #7 | |
General
17501
Rep 25,121
Posts |
Quote:
__________________
My car made front page of Bimmerpost
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
02-19-2020, 05:12 PM | #8 |
First Lieutenant
95
Rep 326
Posts |
The real fun of WLTP is tax changes from April not fuel consumption
I have a 530d arriving in May First road tax goes from £210 to 530 Over a 4y PCP Im pretty OK with this Spec your 540i wrong and its £700 quid extra - not a deal breaker in a 55k *cough* car There are probably worse adjustments..... Cheers |
Appreciate
0
|
02-20-2020, 12:17 AM | #10 | |
King of the North (living in the east...)
1058
Rep 2,158
Posts |
Quote:
330d averaged 45mg on my usual work run, while the X3 averaged just 38mpg. With the 3.0 I can only imagine this would be a little worse still...
__________________
2021 M340i in mineral white, options galore
Previously 2018 440i GC in MG 2015 330D F30 MSport EBII 2012 Alfa Guilietta 2.0d Veloce 2009 Fiat bravo sport 2000 ST Mondeo |
|
Appreciate
0
|
02-20-2020, 02:15 AM | #11 |
Captain
325
Rep 821
Posts |
I doubt it, because a 20L will be working much harder to pull the X3 where as the 30L will pull it very ease.
|
Appreciate
0
|
02-20-2020, 05:59 AM | #12 |
Lieutenant General
6659
Rep 15,858
Posts |
Only if the 2.0d is under powered for the speed driven. BSFC should be in a better place with the 2.0d working a bit harder... engine will be more efficient.
|
Appreciate
0
|
02-20-2020, 06:00 AM | #13 |
Lieutenant General
6659
Rep 15,858
Posts |
Average speed is probably involved here. An extra 5mph will make quite an impact on mpg with the X3 'brick' shape.
|
Appreciate
0
|
02-20-2020, 04:45 PM | #14 |
Enlisted Member
57
Rep 43
Posts |
I have found the WLTP figures on the M40D to be quite accurate tbh. I have just come back from a return trip to Cambridge from Newcastle, first long drive in the M40D.
This including several days local traffic in Cambridge. The car did the trip on a single tank, consuming 60.25lt over 545 miles so an average of 41mpg. Considering the strong winds, rain and traffic i think 41mpg is very good indeed for a 3.0l twin turbo 2 ton SUV. Eco Pro 90% of the time, 72mph true cruise when possible and a total of 52miles coasting (really helps to extend a few more mpg). The WLTP for the M40D are: WLTP Consumption (Combined - Mixture) 37.2 − 39.2 mpg Consumption (low - City Driving) 31 − 32.1 mpg Consumption (medium - Town Driving) 37.2 − 39.2 mpg Consumption (high - Rural Driving) 40.9 − 44.1 mpg Consumption (very high - Motorway) 36.7 − 39.2 mpg |
Appreciate
0
|
Post Reply |
Bookmarks |
|
|