|
|
|
2010 2011 BMW 5 Series Forum F10 Alternative to Radar/Laser Detectors |
|
Post Reply |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
11-01-2017, 06:52 PM | #1 |
Second Lieutenant
91
Rep 291
Posts |
Alternative to Radar/Laser Detectors
I feel so old for some reason recently when a coworker of mine brought up an app called "WAZE".
We were talking about traffic conditions on commutes to work and hazard avoidance and what not. He said to me, "you've heard of WAZE, right?" I responded with just a blank stare...completely unaware of what he was referring to. Anyways...it's an app that functions much like your car's navigation system. It allows the user to point out traffic situations and hazards, etc. Any of you heard of this before? Or have tried using it? |
11-01-2017, 06:56 PM | #2 |
Second Lieutenant
91
Rep 291
Posts |
Of course...now that I've posted the above, I go and do a search within this forum.
Just a couple of threads have been started a few years back. Should've check earlier. Oh well. |
Appreciate
0
|
11-01-2017, 10:59 PM | #3 |
Major General
4503
Rep 5,375
Posts |
I read an article where cops use WAZE to catch people. It also relies on other people's inputs. I'll stick to my trusty Valentine V1. Saved me more than once on last weekend's trip to Carson City.
|
Appreciate
0
|
11-02-2017, 09:04 AM | #4 |
Private First Class
66
Rep 192
Posts
Drives: 2016 Alpine White 528i
Join Date: Jan 2017
Location: So. Cal, U.S
|
Waze is a great software to combine with your Radar/Lidar but it also has some drawbacks. If you live in a suburb or place with high traffic flow you're golden but if you live in a rural area or are traveling on a road with low traffic flow, you can't rely on it for cops since the software works by users reporting.
|
Appreciate
0
|
11-02-2017, 11:36 AM | #5 |
Second Lieutenant
91
Rep 291
Posts |
|
Appreciate
0
|
11-02-2017, 12:13 PM | #6 | |
Major General
4503
Rep 5,375
Posts |
Quote:
I also don't like having to look at my phone (arguably illegal in The People's Republik) while driving. My V1 gives me ample time to slow down. On flat roads I've received a good 5 mile warning (I had the counter and arrows which, obviously, the two cars that zoomed past me didn't as they sped up after CHP #1 passed them and a mile or so later CHP #2 pulled them over)! On hilly roads I get well over a mile; I even get that around curves. |
|
Appreciate
0
|
11-02-2017, 01:12 PM | #7 | |
Second Lieutenant
91
Rep 291
Posts |
Quote:
But I know all about how the po po would camp out like that. I still see that practice going on all the time though. At least in Cali, I think they have to be visible; can't be completely hidden from view. |
|
Appreciate
0
|
11-02-2017, 02:49 PM | #8 |
Major General
4503
Rep 5,375
Posts |
My understanding is/was that they also have to attempt to get driver to slow down first. They interpreted that just being visible satisfied that requirement.
|
Appreciate
0
|
11-02-2017, 03:25 PM | #9 | |
Second Lieutenant
91
Rep 291
Posts |
Quote:
1) Running your plate to see what they're up against. 2) Pacing you, essentially to confirm your speed. I may be completely wrong. But that's my opinion. |
|
Appreciate
0
|
Post Reply |
Bookmarks |
|
|