05-03-2017, 07:39 AM | #1 |
Captain
311
Rep 713
Posts |
440i MPPK MPG
I know this is a bit of a silly question, i.e., why spend two grand on something to make your car go faster and louder and then worry about petrol costs, BUT...
I had MPPK fitted yesterday to my 440i GC and yes it sounds great, (though my kids are laughing at me for being a middle aged boy racer), and yes, I could feel a difference in power at the top end, so I am pleased with it except that... The mpg seems to have dropped considerably. (it was on 29.7 after 12,000 miles) It's too early to compare the figures properly but the mpg seems to be well down and under 10mpg on any sort of acceleration and even today driving like a "girl" in comfort, I couldn't manage 30 on a 10 mile journey. Anyone got any thoughts on this. I'm happy to see a 10% drop but it feels like more than this. |
05-03-2017, 07:42 AM | #2 |
Lieutenant General
1867
Rep 13,043
Posts
Drives: BMW M340I G20
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: UK
|
Does the kit claim to up the BHP/torque?
__________________
--------------------------------------------------------------
Current car.M240i. Previous.MINI JCW. E92 325i. 435d M235i.M135i. 635d Coupe, E92 M3 manual, E92 M3 DCT Competition Pack. E92 335i, Porsche Cayman S Gen2, 135i Coupe. E92 320d, MK5 R32. MK5 Golf GTi,MK5 Golf GT-TDI,E46 318Ci. |
Appreciate
0
|
05-03-2017, 07:50 AM | #4 |
Major General
3489
Rep 9,709
Posts |
OP, you are more likely suffering from a calibration of fuel computer issue. There should be no reason, at low engine load conditions, that fuel usage is the same as before.
Start logging your fill ups with a free app like Road trip, to get a true reading. There is a way to tweak the OBC readings to line up with real world figures, by altering some value in the instrument cluster service mode. |
Appreciate
0
|
05-03-2017, 07:54 AM | #5 | |
Captain
311
Rep 713
Posts |
Quote:
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
05-03-2017, 07:57 AM | #6 |
Captain
311
Rep 713
Posts |
|
Appreciate
0
|
05-03-2017, 08:00 AM | #7 |
Captain
311
Rep 713
Posts |
Actually, I've just read the blurb on MPG which says "Comparable consumption despite higher performance. The fuel consumption and emissions levels in the ECE driving cycle correspond to those of the standard engine despite the significantly greater performance"
|
Appreciate
0
|
05-03-2017, 08:06 AM | #8 |
Major General
4271
Rep 6,945
Posts |
The MPPK I had fitted to my old F10 520d said something similar. I actually found it marginally improved the fuel economy though.
|
Appreciate
0
|
05-03-2017, 02:21 PM | #9 |
Captain
346
Rep 897
Posts |
Off topic,wish They did this without the exhaust
__________________
2014 f330d
2015 f335d 2016 f32 440i tanzanite/white merino 2008 Toyota Yaris sr 2005 e46 320d. 1996 316i. |
Appreciate
0
|
05-03-2017, 03:27 PM | #10 |
Captain
311
Rep 713
Posts |
Its not that loud in comfort mode. If you sit on your drive and rev it, you'll wake up the neighbours (and if you are in sports mode, whoever they've got buried in their gardens) but otherwise its just a bit more throaty.
if you want the upgrade without the exhaust, there's many chips available or if you want warranty, there AC Schnitzer but that more expensive. |
05-03-2017, 04:07 PM | #12 |
Captain
311
Rep 713
Posts |
|
Appreciate
0
|
05-03-2017, 04:14 PM | #13 |
Captain
327
Rep 665
Posts |
|
Appreciate
0
|
05-04-2017, 02:03 AM | #14 |
First Lieutenant
211
Rep 389
Posts |
I've been monitoring this - I'm averaging 29Mpg with the 340i MPPK. I've had the pack since last Sept.
If I look at the big motorway runs I get around 33Mpg and I have recently hit 37Mpg on the M1. I haven't been driving economically either. I believe I get around c.400miles to a full tank.
__________________
X5 40d M F15 - July 2018 - Space Grey
Mini JCW F56 - June 2018 - Rebel Green Previous: 340i M F31 2016-18, 2015-16 435i M F32, 2013-15 330d M F30, 2011-13 Mercedes C250, 2008-11 320i E92 |
Appreciate
0
|
05-04-2017, 03:26 AM | #15 |
Major General
3719
Rep 8,636
Posts |
Given the M140i runs the mppsk tune standard (or so it appears), mpg is still pretty good for the performance. OK the 3er is never going to be quite so good as it weighs more but shouldn't be far off.....
|
Appreciate
0
|
05-04-2017, 06:15 AM | #16 |
Private First Class
139
Rep 134
Posts |
I'm currently averaging 32.27mpg after 4,400 miles in my 440i MPPSK. Had the kit fitted new so can't comment on the difference but I'm happy with that. It's a mix of very short and very long trips. Frequently see close to 40mpg on long motorway cruises.
I generally use Sport mode day-to-day and then slip into Eco Pro on long motorway runs when active cruise control takes the strain.
__________________
X3 M40i in Phytonic blue
440i GC MPPSK in Tanzanite blue Caterham R400 in Viper blue |
Appreciate
0
|
05-12-2017, 06:53 AM | #17 |
Captain
311
Rep 713
Posts |
Well after a week and nearly 1000 miles it is showing about 31 mpg. I checked the onboard computer against what I'd spent and it was bang on. I think my early worries were either due to it "bedding in" (if there is such a thing) or me driving it more aggressively. Anyway, it doesn't seem to be the problem, I thought it was.
|
Appreciate
0
|
05-12-2017, 09:53 AM | #18 |
Banned
4280
Rep 7,703
Posts |
Anyone here added the MPPSK whilst the car is on a pcp? Do you have to tell BMW finance and are they ok with it?
Also, what's the price people have paid for it the MPPSK and from where? Thanks |
Appreciate
0
|
05-12-2017, 11:40 AM | #20 |
Major General
3489
Rep 9,709
Posts |
|
Appreciate
0
|
05-13-2017, 02:53 AM | #21 |
New Member
6
Rep 27
Posts |
Mine was 1999 in BMW Coopers in Reading. Car is owned as well. Had a journey to continent recently and enjoyed a lot - MPPSK sound is so great when cruising through small villages even most of the time I had it in the normal mode.
|
Appreciate
0
|
Post Reply |
Bookmarks |
|
|