Mo Reviews
BMW Garage BMW Meets Register Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Go Back   BMW M3 and BMW M4 Forum > BMW F80 M3 / F82 M4 Forum > BMW M4 GTS Discussions

Post Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
      04-13-2016, 02:51 AM   #1
Paul-Bracq-BMW
Moderator
Paul-Bracq-BMW's Avatar
Australia
4092
Rep
1,973
Posts

Drives: 1981 323i, sports M5, LSD
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Australia

iTrader: (0)

1st BMW M4 GTS Reviews: AUTOCAR and Autoexpress

BIMMERPOST
     Featured on BIMMERPOST.com
Enjoy ladies and gentlemen!
Attached Images
     
__________________
1981 323i, 143 Kashmir-Metallic, 0094 Pergament, Sports M5, LSD.
Appreciate 6
      04-13-2016, 03:05 AM   #2
Paul-Bracq-BMW
Moderator
Paul-Bracq-BMW's Avatar
Australia
4092
Rep
1,973
Posts

Drives: 1981 323i, sports M5, LSD
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Australia

iTrader: (0)

Auto Express Review

Here you go...
Attached Images
  
__________________
1981 323i, 143 Kashmir-Metallic, 0094 Pergament, Sports M5, LSD.
Appreciate 5
      04-13-2016, 09:02 AM   #3
Porsche50th
Private
United_States
31
Rep
65
Posts

Drives: 2014 Porsche 50th Anniv.
Join Date: Sep 2015
Location: Florida

iTrader: (0)

Danke

Quote:
Originally Posted by Paul-Bracq-BMW View Post
Here you go...
Been waiting for a test drive article. Thank you very much..
Appreciate 0
      04-13-2016, 10:31 AM   #4
W///
Lieutenant General
W///'s Avatar
7469
Rep
12,300
Posts

Drives: F82GTS, E36/E92M3, Z4M
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: SC

iTrader: (13)

You would think they were talking about the M2 here
__________________
Current:
16 F82 M4 GTS, Black Sapphire/Black, DCT
08 E92 M3, Sparkling Graphite/Bamboo Beige, 6MT
07 E85 Z4M Roadster, Alpine White/Red, 6MT
99 E36 M3, Techno Violet/Dove Grey, 6MT
Appreciate 6
      04-13-2016, 10:43 AM   #5
VCP
Colonel
VCP's Avatar
Canada
1390
Rep
2,336
Posts

Drives: M4GTS BSM/F90comp/BSM M2CS
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Canada

iTrader: (0)

Thank you thank you thank you....
Appreciate 2
      04-13-2016, 10:44 AM   #6
TheBingoBalls
Brigadier General
TheBingoBalls's Avatar
Canada
3817
Rep
4,657
Posts

Drives: BMW
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Toronto, Ontario

iTrader: (1)

Garage List
Interesting. I think this is something BMW needs to think about. If the GTS is being praised as the BMW M(3/4) that everyone knows and loves, that says something about how lacking the base car is regardless of good of a car it is. I'm sure any M3/M4 variant is a solid car but if you have to pay extra to get what the M3/M4 should have been, it kind of leaves a sour taste in your mouth.
Appreciate 7
      04-13-2016, 10:49 AM   #7
VCP
Colonel
VCP's Avatar
Canada
1390
Rep
2,336
Posts

Drives: M4GTS BSM/F90comp/BSM M2CS
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Canada

iTrader: (0)


Quote:
Originally Posted by TheBingoBalls View Post
Interesting. I think this is something BMW needs to think about. If the GTS is being praised as the BMW M(3/4) that everyone knows and loves, that says something about how lacking the base car is regardless of good of a car it is. I'm sure any M3/M4 variant is a solid car but if you have to pay extra to get what the M3/M4 should have been, it kind of leaves a sour taste in your mouth.
Appreciate 8
      04-13-2016, 10:59 AM   #8
John Tanglewood
Porn Star
John Tanglewood's Avatar
Jamaica
1314
Rep
3,350
Posts

Drives: E60 M5 | F95 X5M | F90 M5
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Stamford, CT

iTrader: (13)

Quote:
Originally Posted by TheBingoBalls View Post
Interesting. I think this is something BMW needs to think about. If the GTS is being praised as the BMW M(3/4) that everyone knows and loves, that says something about how lacking the base car is regardless of good of a car it is. I'm sure any M3/M4 variant is a solid car but if you have to pay extra to get what the M3/M4 should have been, it kind of leaves a sour taste in your mouth.
__________________
Appreciate 6
      04-13-2016, 10:59 AM   #9
phoenx
Lieutenant
333
Rep
471
Posts

Drives: E46 M3, F80 M3, Tacoma, GT4 RS
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Los Angeles, CA

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by TheBingoBalls View Post
Interesting. I think this is something BMW needs to think about. If the GTS is being praised as the BMW M(3/4) that everyone knows and loves, that says something about how lacking the base car is regardless of good of a car it is. I'm sure any M3/M4 variant is a solid car but if you have to pay extra to get what the M3/M4 should have been, it kind of leaves a sour taste in your mouth.
+1

If there would be a 4 door gts, I'd be all over it. An f80 crt would be stuff of dreams.
Appreciate 0
      04-13-2016, 11:02 AM   #10
///MFanatic
Private First Class
///MFanatic's Avatar
133
Rep
102
Posts

Drives: Alpine White F80 6mt
Join Date: Mar 2015
Location: GA

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by TheBingoBalls
Interesting. I think this is something BMW needs to think about. If the GTS is being praised as the BMW M(3/4) that everyone knows and loves, that says something about how lacking the base car is regardless of good of a car it is. I'm sure any M3/M4 variant is a solid car but if you have to pay extra to get what the M3/M4 should have been, it kind of leaves a sour taste in your mouth.
The F8x out performs its predecessors in every measurable way. Hell when it was first introduced a few years ago everyone was singing its praises. I feel like people forget this. The only difference now is that other options on the market are quickly getting better and keeping pace. This is great though! Competition is a good thing. People are quick to dog the F8x because it doesn't smoke the competition like it use to, but that doesn't mean it should be looked down on. It's not just a solid car, it's a true M.
Appreciate 26
      04-13-2016, 11:24 AM   #11
jphughan
Brigadier General
jphughan's Avatar
United_States
594
Rep
4,488
Posts

Drives: '16 Cayman GT4
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Austin, TX

iTrader: (0)

Surprised that posting copyrighted material without permission isn't against the forum rules, but apparently it's not only ok but can even be featured on the front page. I figured that if the magazines wanted to give those articles away, they'd put them on their websites with ads around them.
__________________
'16 Cayman GT4 (delivery pics, comparison to E92 M3 write-up)

Gone but not forgotten:
'11.75 M3 E92 Le Mans | Black Nov w/ Alum | 6MT (owned 5/2011 - 11/2015)
Appreciate 1
      04-13-2016, 11:28 AM   #12
clbmw
Major
633
Rep
1,483
Posts

Drives: 320d M135i
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: UK

iTrader: (0)

Impressive

So a real show of what M can do... And yet the alphabet and BMW have between them ensured i and M will never meet. Missing a trick I think
Appreciate 0
      04-13-2016, 11:36 AM   #13
Captain Unknown GT4
Captain
Captain Unknown GT4's Avatar
557
Rep
762
Posts

Drives: GT4
Join Date: Mar 2016
Location: EU

iTrader: (0)

I like it, and In the end I personally dont give a rats ass what any car reporter accually think. I am not saying that in a bad way. But In the end I judge the car the way I do it. And some things tell me I will like this One as well.

In the same way I totalt loved my m3 e46 CSL, man nobody did at the time understand how great that car was! I dont pay attention to car testers when talking about my Porsche GT4 suffering from long gearing, they just repeat what others say and then its like the crap car suffering from this. I drive my gt4 on the ring, its sweetspoot gearing. Smal track, I as well think its perfekt. I am sure I will like drivtrain on m4 Gts, lets see now if others start repeating drivtrain in Gts.

As well I did at the time Love the smg in my CSL, very much so in S6 mode. Only then was it fast, not al drove it on Nur in S6 as you could only reach S6 if fully 100% you put ESP off. Just cant wait to I get this Gts and set it up properly to my liking👏
Appreciate 5
      04-13-2016, 11:39 AM   #14
firedown31
Major
United_States
913
Rep
1,427
Posts

Drives: '16 AW M3
Join Date: Jun 2015
Location: NH

iTrader: (0)

34mpg average!? am I reading that right
Appreciate 0
      04-13-2016, 11:42 AM   #15
greekcs
Major
greekcs's Avatar
United_States
773
Rep
1,113
Posts

Drives: 2020 M340i xDrive
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Long Island, NY

iTrader: (0)

it's the best car we've ever tested since the last best car we've ever tested.
__________________
2003 11/02 Steel Gray Metallic on Red M3 - SMGII - VF570 - SUPERSPRINT - KW - BBS - CSL ROOF SOLD
2015 09/14 Alpine White on Red 435i xDrive MPPK - Expensive black vinyl with special lettering. SOLD
2020 12/19 Mineral Gray Metallic on Black Vinyl interior M340i xDrive
Appreciate 1
      04-13-2016, 11:54 AM   #16
hotrod2448
grand poobah
hotrod2448's Avatar
United_States
254
Rep
2,253
Posts

Drives: F80 M3, F10 535i
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Charlotte, NC

iTrader: (0)

Garage List
2011 335d  [0.00]
It's interesting they praise the steering feedback several times. Looking in ETK the rack and column have the same part numbers as the standard M4, I guess the difference is made up in the new suspension components, possibly software and/or placebo effect.
Appreciate 0
      04-13-2016, 11:58 AM   #17
jphughan
Brigadier General
jphughan's Avatar
United_States
594
Rep
4,488
Posts

Drives: '16 Cayman GT4
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Austin, TX

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by hotrod2448 View Post
It's interesting they praise the steering feedback several times. Looking in ETK the rack and column have the same part numbers as the standard M4, I guess the difference is made up in the new suspension components, possibly software and/or placebo effect.
The 991 911s were panned for steering feedback, and then the GT3 came out with identical steering hardware and only retuned software, and everyone loved it, and now they love the GT4's steering even more, which also has identical hardware and software based on the GT3 but tuned a bit more.
__________________
'16 Cayman GT4 (delivery pics, comparison to E92 M3 write-up)

Gone but not forgotten:
'11.75 M3 E92 Le Mans | Black Nov w/ Alum | 6MT (owned 5/2011 - 11/2015)
Appreciate 1
      04-13-2016, 12:02 PM   #18
Boss330
Major General
Boss330's Avatar
No_Country
1712
Rep
5,109
Posts

Drives: BMW
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Earth

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by ///MFanatic
Quote:
Originally Posted by TheBingoBalls
Interesting. I think this is something BMW needs to think about. If the GTS is being praised as the BMW M(3/4) that everyone knows and loves, that says something about how lacking the base car is regardless of good of a car it is. I'm sure any M3/M4 variant is a solid car but if you have to pay extra to get what the M3/M4 should have been, it kind of leaves a sour taste in your mouth.
The F8x out performs its predecessors in every measurable way. Hell when it was first introduced a few years ago everyone was singing its praises. I feel like people forget this. The only difference now is that other options on the market are quickly getting better and keeping pace. This is great though! Competition is a good thing. People are quick to dog the F8x because it doesn't smoke the competition like it use to, but that doesn't mean it should be looked down on. It's not just a solid car, it's a true M.
There was a mixed reception of the Fx gen M3/4 with leading European magazines like EVO repeatedly being critical of the suspension and handling characteristics of the car. It has also lost to the C63 AMG in German magazines.

Not saying it's a bad car, just saying that at least parts of the European press has been lukewarm about the latest M3/4
Appreciate 4
      04-13-2016, 12:05 PM   #19
X3paul
Banned
151
Rep
481
Posts

Drives: E9 CSi, Z4M coup, E65 730d, E4
Join Date: Apr 2014
Location: UK

iTrader: (0)

The way I see it this review is only bad news for m3/4 buyers. This gts will be a rare collectible and Again it shows the current M will be another lost gen - no E30 or E46 -. Good news for me cause it just proves again that the E46 Csl I bought that cost as much as new M4 was the right decision. And having been at a track event this sunday with the M4 really made me feel sorry for the state of things. I posted before but current M as great weight distribution and clearly lighter than E90 but thats it. Corners flat but numb steering, turbo lag and the awfull eng (in my opinion) its all brute force and no finess. Previous generations were laser guided missiles:just enough power to hit the target. Did the job and put a smile on. Current gen is more like napalm. Huge explosion (torque) all over the place but cause the enemy hid in underground tunnels...a miss for bmw. No substitute for NA eng sorry. And these blokes seem to agree with me
Appreciate 0
      04-13-2016, 12:06 PM   #20
X3paul
Banned
151
Rep
481
Posts

Drives: E9 CSi, Z4M coup, E65 730d, E4
Join Date: Apr 2014
Location: UK

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by Boss330
Quote:
Originally Posted by ///MFanatic
Quote:
Originally Posted by TheBingoBalls
Interesting. I think this is something BMW needs to think about. If the GTS is being praised as the BMW M(3/4) that everyone knows and loves, that says something about how lacking the base car is regardless of good of a car it is. I'm sure any M3/M4 variant is a solid car but if you have to pay extra to get what the M3/M4 should have been, it kind of leaves a sour taste in your mouth.
The F8x out performs its predecessors in every measurable way. Hell when it was first introduced a few years ago everyone was singing its praises. I feel like people forget this. The only difference now is that other options on the market are quickly getting better and keeping pace. This is great though! Competition is a good thing. People are quick to dog the F8x because it doesn't smoke the competition like it use to, but that doesn't mean it should be looked down on. It's not just a solid car, it's a true M.
There was a mixed reception of the Fx gen M3/4 with leading European magazines like EVO repeatedly being critical of the suspension and handling characteristics of the car. It has also lost to the C63 AMG in German magazines.

Not saying it's a bad car, just saying that at least parts of the European press has been lukewarm about the latest M3/4
Not just press...
Appreciate 2
      04-13-2016, 12:15 PM   #21
TheBingoBalls
Brigadier General
TheBingoBalls's Avatar
Canada
3817
Rep
4,657
Posts

Drives: BMW
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Toronto, Ontario

iTrader: (1)

Garage List
Quote:
Originally Posted by ///MFanatic View Post
The F8x out performs its predecessors in every measurable way. Hell when it was first introduced a few years ago everyone was singing its praises. I feel like people forget this. The only difference now is that other options on the market are quickly getting better and keeping pace. This is great though! Competition is a good thing. People are quick to dog the F8x because it doesn't smoke the competition like it use to, but that doesn't mean it should be looked down on. It's not just a solid car, it's a true M.
I'm not dogging the base car in anyway. The base M3/M4 is still a highly capable car but at the same time, most reviews and owners feel it could have been much more. The ZCP is released and reviews say that its what the base M3/M4 should feel like to begin with and now the GTS review where it's basically saying this is what BMW M is all about.

I would be totally off base if the base car didn't have the criticism it currently has. But based on reviews, it seems like the ZCP and GTS add the small things to the M3/M4 that align it more past cars and I'm not talking about adding more power and torque.

Going back to the E92 M3 and E92 M3 GTS, there were differences between the two but not to degree of F82 M4 and M4 GTS and there weren't comments where the M3 GTS was that much better than the base car.

Maybe the reviews of the M4 GTS are over exaggerating a bit, I don't know, but I'm definitely not dogging the base M4 but I'm sure M3/M4 owners feel there are some things that the ZCP and perhaps the GTS have that the base car should have by default because that's how some M5 owners felt when the M5 ZCP was released.

Quote:
Originally Posted by hotrod2448 View Post
It's interesting they praise the steering feedback several times. Looking in ETK the rack and column have the same part numbers as the standard M4, I guess the difference is made up in the new suspension components, possibly software and/or placebo effect.
This goes back to my original comment which seems to have annoyed some people. If the steering is in fact improved, why has it improved? Is it hardware, software or combination of both? What is the cost or how much different is it than the base model? If the suspension is nothing special, could they have used it for the base car or were they just saving it for the GTS? It's these small things I was referring to in my original comment. If the GTS has gone through a serious re-working of hardware, ok, but if it's just minor tuning with minor hardware changes then I don't see how it owners of the base M3/M4 wouldn't question it regardless of how much they love their cars.

Last edited by TheBingoBalls; 04-13-2016 at 12:24 PM..
Appreciate 0
      04-13-2016, 12:26 PM   #22
Boss330
Major General
Boss330's Avatar
No_Country
1712
Rep
5,109
Posts

Drives: BMW
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Earth

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by hotrod2448
It's interesting they praise the steering feedback several times. Looking in ETK the rack and column have the same part numbers as the standard M4, I guess the difference is made up in the new suspension components, possibly software and/or placebo effect.
Dial in a bit more negative camber on the front wheels and different coils and shocks as well as sway bars and steering feel changes quite a lot
Appreciate 2
Post Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:20 AM.




f80post
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
1Addicts.com, BIMMERPOST.com, E90Post.com, F30Post.com, M3Post.com, ZPost.com, 5Post.com, 6Post.com, 7Post.com, XBimmers.com logo and trademark are properties of BIMMERPOST