|
|
|
|
PLEASE HELP SUPPORT E90POST BY DOING YOUR TIRERACK SHOPPING FROM THIS BANNER, THANKS! |
|
BMW Garage | BMW Meets | Register | Today's Posts | Search |
|
BMW 3-Series (E90 E92) Forum
>
ContiSportContact 2 RFT not good???
|
|
Wheels and Tires forum Sponsored by The Tire Rack
Please help to directly support e90post by doing your tirerack shopping from the above link. For every sale made through the link, e90post gets sponsor support to keep the site alive. Disclaimer |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
03-11-2006, 09:51 AM | #1 |
Enlisted Member
1
Rep 49
Posts |
ContiSportContact 2 RFT not good???
Hi guys,
My E91 was delivered with ContiSportContact 2 RFT tyres (225/45/17 on stye 159 wheels). Since I took delivery at the end of November last year , I haven't driven them yet (since I directly mounted winter tyres - perfect Bridgestone LM-22 RFT's in size 205/55/16 on aftermarket 16' alu rims), but I am planning on mounting my summer wheels next week. On the website of auto, motor und sport (www.auto-motor-und-sport.de) however, I read a short test of RFT tyres and it appeared that the Conti's were the worst of the test. Does anyone else have good/bad experiences with these tyres? If they appear to be bad, I think I will go back to the dealer and ask for replacement. I have been looking at style 162,195 or 199 18' wheels as well... What do you guys think? |
03-11-2006, 09:56 AM | #2 |
Lieutenant General
1312
Rep 10,185
Posts |
Thats strange, the couple people I have spoken too with those tires say they are very nice
Why does the test say they are no good ? ( you have to pay to download it )
__________________
BMW if you are reading, I need a job, Please. |
Appreciate
0
|
03-11-2006, 10:48 AM | #3 |
Enlisted Member
1
Rep 49
Posts |
I haven't paid for the download. I am waiting for the magazine in Dutch to be published. I assume that the test will be published in the April edition of the Dutch magazine since it is not yet in the March one.
I also thought that the Conti's were good, so I was quite happy that they were mounted... |
Appreciate
0
|
03-11-2006, 10:50 PM | #4 | |
Captain
37
Rep 794
Posts
Drives: 2021 M2C, 97 M3
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Here, there
|
Quote:
That being said, they did score well in a Recent tire test. Namely on the strength of their wet road performance and tire wear rating.
__________________
Performance Center Delivery, June 21, 2013: 2013 E92 335is | Le Mans Blue | Gray Leather with Black | 6MT | 19" Style 313's | Michelin Pilot Super Sports | BMW Carbon Fiber Rear Spoiler | |
|
Appreciate
0
|
03-12-2006, 05:35 PM | #5 |
Captain
146
Rep 898
Posts
Drives: F90 M5
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: UK
|
I've got the Conti's on my E90 325i with 17" 158 wheels and I think they are a good tyre. I don't have anything to reference them to except for my old car's Pirelli P6000s but the car handles really well. Acceleration off the line in the wet can make them spin and I made the rears chirp round a corner in the dry once at relitavely low speed, but other than that I think they are a good tyre.
And although the treadwear rating doesn't mean much between manufacurers, the Conti's have 240 and all of the other runflats have 140. Mine still look pretty new after 6000 miles. |
Appreciate
0
|
03-12-2006, 08:31 PM | #6 |
Major
197
Rep 1,180
Posts |
Since Jan. production, some of the E91 for the NA market are being equipped with ContiProContact SSR (self-supporting runflat) on style 159 wheels. These are a new generation performance all season; they may not be offered in Europe, since the Euro market does not prefer all seasons. Tirerack has tested these tires in the non-run flat version; they are highly rated in all categories (road, track dry and wet braking, etc.). Like all tire manufacturers, some of their tire designs will perform much better than others from the same manufacturer. You can't generalize when it comes to any one tire manufacturer. There are so many variables.
|
Appreciate
0
|
03-13-2006, 09:43 AM | #7 | |
Enlisted Member
1
Rep 49
Posts |
Quote:
Thank you for the input E30M3Driver. Althought the Conti's ended second in the test, apparently, the subjective impression of the test drivers wasn't too good after all. I'm wondering what the German test points out as reasons for the last place in the test... |
|
Appreciate
0
|
03-13-2006, 09:47 AM | #8 | |
Enlisted Member
1
Rep 49
Posts |
Quote:
Thank you DerekS. As you point out yourself, it often depends on the design whether or not tyres of a manufacturer perform good or bad. I was happy with the Conti's since the non-run-flat version of the SportContact 2 scored very good in a test of the same German magazine. Apparently, adding the SSR to them, didn't do any good... Or the competitors have become stronger... |
|
Appreciate
0
|
Bookmarks |
|
|