|
|
|
|
|
|
BMW Garage | BMW Meets | Register | Today's Posts | Search |
|
BMW 3-Series (E90 E92) Forum
>
Is anyone running N54 Intake Manifold?
|
|
04-16-2018, 06:14 AM | #1 |
Colonel
3768
Rep 2,738
Posts |
Is anyone running N54 Intake Manifold?
I did some searching and only found one person (BPC Customer) who was working on it and then seems like he swapped back to a 3 Stage.
I assume BPC Alice is running a N54 Intake Manifold? I’m really looking for reports from a N/A application. Would love to see what the shape of a dyno of a N54 manifold on a N52 looks like. Also does anyone know the ID of a N54 Throttle Body? Would the user swap throttle bodies along with a manifold swap? I’m running a WCR Big Bore Throttle Body currently but was curious if the N54 could be a cheap and available BBTB for those who still have stock throttle bodies. |
04-16-2018, 07:08 AM | #2 |
Banned
2470
Rep 9,004
Posts |
www.1addicts.com/forums/showthread.php?t=1451616
N54 TB is larger than the N52, but has a provision on the side that needs to be blocked off. Also, the ID is smaller than your big bore. |
04-16-2018, 08:12 AM | #3 | |
Colonel
3768
Rep 2,738
Posts |
Quote:
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
04-16-2018, 08:18 AM | #4 |
Private First Class
84
Rep 110
Posts |
I'm running the N54 intake, but my N52 is in an E30 swap. Just have a few details to sort out before I should be running. I'll have to compare the throttle bodies, as they appear to be the same size. The vacuum inlet on the side of the N54 throttle needs to be used for the CVV system, as the N54 intake does not have an inlet on the manifold to plug into. Also, if you have an early model E90 with the slightly rounded throttle body wiring plug, the newer tb has a more square connector that will need to be adapted.
|
Appreciate
3
|
04-16-2018, 08:26 AM | #5 | |
Colonel
3768
Rep 2,738
Posts |
Quote:
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
04-16-2018, 08:56 AM | #6 |
Major General
3975
Rep 7,215
Posts |
BPC has posted several dynos of the N54 intake on an N52. Basically you trade a little low end (vs the 3 stage) for additional top end. If you were coming from a single stage, you probably would only gain power and torque (assuming other mods and a tune).
|
Appreciate
1
Taskmaster2470.00 |
04-16-2018, 09:43 AM | #7 |
Old Geezer
364
Rep 1,193
Posts
Drives: 08 E92 N53B30
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Budweis
|
I have N54 manifold on N53. I just installed big bore TB from RiotRacing. I had to route gas tank ventilation to airbox because this TB doesn’t have connector for the vent hose. I didn’t go to dyno yet but according to Awron I have 276 PS. If you compare my lap time to other cars it’s not bad. I’m in second place (325i). Unfortunately I had to quit after first round because my engine wasn’t running on all cylinders. I thought I had some bad coils but after I switch the car off and on again it was running normally. I thing that the problem started when I hit the rev limiter. (I have new aluminum flywheel)
__________________
|
Appreciate
3
|
04-16-2018, 09:54 AM | #8 | |
Banned
2470
Rep 9,004
Posts |
Quote:
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
04-16-2018, 10:50 AM | #9 |
Colonel
3768
Rep 2,738
Posts |
Couldn’t I just drill and install a port into the n54 manifold for the vacuum line from the valve cover? I’d rather run the WCR throttle body than a N54 just to have the port.
|
Appreciate
0
|
04-16-2018, 10:51 AM | #10 |
Resident Pedant
503
Rep 792
Posts |
Why stop at the OE N54 Manifold? There are aftermarket N54 manifolds that, presumably, will fit just as well.
|
Appreciate
1
desertman1232215.50 |
04-16-2018, 10:53 AM | #11 |
Major General
3975
Rep 7,215
Posts |
the point is it's cheap. if you want to spend more money, the N54 manifold isn't necessarily optimized for N/A - it just happens to bolt up fairly easily, and work a little better at high RPM where the resonance design of the 3-stage works against you.
|
Appreciate
0
|
04-16-2018, 11:09 AM | #12 |
Colonel
3768
Rep 2,738
Posts |
I bought a OEM N54 manifold they are cheaply available for $100 or less. Now wondering about that vacuum line on google images I found a pic of what looks to be an added port this is exactly what I was thinking I would do:
So here’s a question. Does anyone have any suggestions for what I can use for the vacuum line to the valve cover? I was thinking rubber fuel line but not sure if it will collapse under the vacuum. Thoughts? Last edited by Biginboca; 04-16-2018 at 11:31 AM.. |
Appreciate
1
andrey_gta299.50 |
04-16-2018, 11:31 AM | #13 |
Slow.
3782
Rep 7,152
Posts
Drives: Single Turbo N54 on Meth!
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Boston, MA
|
Quote:
I just drilled and tapped a fitting with a barb provision for a 1/4 ID line using a fitting like this: https://www.zoro.com/zoro-select-hos...p0/i/G1502916/ Used some 5M epoxy on the threads to help it seal. https://www.verociousmotorsports.com...ld-by-the-Foot <--This is what I use on my n54. The stock line that BMW uses with the braided cover is fine too. Not sure on the price tho. You should be able to buy standard boring vacuum line by the foot at any normal autoparts store. edit: I would install the vacuum line/port/fitting on the bottom of the manifold so it doesn't stick out and isn't so fugly like in the pic you posted. Don't forget to blow out the Im after drilling and tapping but before you insert the threaded barb. You may also not need as large a vacuum line/source.
__________________
Last edited by Torgus; 04-16-2018 at 12:24 PM.. |
Appreciate
0
|
04-16-2018, 12:06 PM | #14 |
Old Geezer
364
Rep 1,193
Posts
Drives: 08 E92 N53B30
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Budweis
|
This is my setup for PCV and gas tank ventilation.
__________________
|
Appreciate
0
|
04-16-2018, 06:00 PM | #17 |
Colonel
3768
Rep 2,738
Posts |
BudVlad Torgus How did you guys line up the throttle body inlet with the air box outlet from the MAF sensor? It looks like the n54 manifold points the throttle body inlet downwards?
|
Appreciate
0
|
04-16-2018, 06:19 PM | #18 |
Banned
2470
Rep 9,004
Posts |
BPC was supposed to be making a kit for this - don’t use a silicone hose and try to bend it. On the link I posted, you can clearly see it collapsing in - it may be the reason for that huge torque dip.
|
Appreciate
0
|
04-16-2018, 06:20 PM | #19 | |
Slow.
3782
Rep 7,152
Posts
Drives: Single Turbo N54 on Meth!
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Boston, MA
|
Quote:
Sorry if I was unclear. I never did this with my NA e90. Just wanted to explain why the pictures n54 intake was modded and how-to do it yourself to add a vacuum port. My guess is you would need a custom pipe and or to get creative with your throttle body piping etc to use the n54 mani. I doubt the gains are worth it regarding the cost. Again, could be wrong. No n42 in my stable to look at. IMO if you are going to go that far for an NA build I would have a custom forward facing tapered log intake manifold made with trumpets spaced off the manifolds floor fitted to a large throttle body. But like all intake mods if the head/cams are a restriction you can only do so much. I say go turbo or go home I know that is not popular to hear but if you want hp it is the only choice. No off the shelf kits availible iirc. |
|
Appreciate
0
|
04-16-2018, 06:32 PM | #20 | |
Colonel
3768
Rep 2,738
Posts |
Quote:
When I spoke with BPC (Randall) he said the midrange torque loss was minimal. He felt the lower rpms pretty much similar power to the 3 stage. He said that after 4500 rpms it becomes a different beast, the N54 manifold is a game changer. He said he doesn’t know why more people aren’t pursuing this. So based on that feedback and that I’ll be into the whole upgrade for less than $200 I’m going forward. I have no interest in turbo. No offense to those who are and I hope they enjoy their car as much as I do mine. And I want to drop this dyno chart here from the thread that Taskmaster linked in post 2: free image host The power on the orange line all the way to 7500 makes this mod so worthwhile. I currently have a 3 stage and BPC tune and it feels like the red line exactly. Even though I have raised my rev limiter to 7500 I’m not making power up there. You can feel what that red line would show if you extrapolated it out to 7500, the power is falling fast. It’s easy to see why Randall felt this would be a game changer. Making peak power for another 1000 rpms (6500-7500) and staying in a lower gear through that will substantially change the character and performance of the car I feel. Last edited by Biginboca; 04-16-2018 at 06:45 PM.. |
|
Appreciate
1
gT-BMW203.00 |
04-16-2018, 06:48 PM | #21 |
Banned
2470
Rep 9,004
Posts |
Chances are you’re making the same peak or higher - you won’t know without a dyno?
|
Appreciate
1
atmosphericM519.50 |
04-16-2018, 06:57 PM | #22 | |
Colonel
3768
Rep 2,738
Posts |
Quote:
Look at the dyno paying attention to the shape of the curve and look at the area under the dynos from 5000-7500. One has a big sharp peak with slopes, the other is like a table top. Even with the same peak power the table top would be better. I firmly believe total area under the dyno matters more than a single high peak output, when both have the same peak number. And where the rubber meats the road, when I’m running the car hard I’m only passing from 5500 rpms to 7500 rpms through each gear. That n54 dyno is especially sweet in that range. |
|
Appreciate
1
atmosphericM519.50 |
Bookmarks |
|
|