04-03-2014, 10:35 PM | #23 |
Lieutenant
136
Rep 504
Posts |
|
Appreciate
0
|
04-03-2014, 10:45 PM | #24 |
92
Rep 1,150
Posts |
When you purchase a car for business purposes it's now seen as an asset of the company, once you sell you're taxed on the sale price of the car. You can write off interest and expenses.
When you lease, you don't have this problem and can also write off interest and expenses. * As always, please contact your accountant for accuracy. Michael |
Appreciate
0
|
04-04-2014, 10:47 AM | #25 |
Brigadier General
1253
Rep 3,688
Posts
Drives: 2021 Supra 3.0 (Past: 2015 M23
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: San Francisco, CA
|
There was a post on the forums cant find it anymore but basically the balloon is 40% to calculate interest on the ballon you do:
Balloon Price*0.03*(5/60)
__________________
Last edited by Powaup; 04-04-2014 at 10:54 AM.. |
Appreciate
0
|
04-04-2014, 11:46 AM | #26 | |
Private First Class
31
Rep 124
Posts |
Quote:
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
04-04-2014, 12:08 PM | #27 |
Brigadier General
1253
Rep 3,688
Posts
Drives: 2021 Supra 3.0 (Past: 2015 M23
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: San Francisco, CA
|
If you lease the car with intentions on buying it out at lease end you do not need to worry about mileage or return fee's
__________________
|
Appreciate
1
|
04-04-2014, 05:21 PM | #28 | |
Private First Class
31
Rep 124
Posts |
Quote:
I'm just trying to figure out whether leasing with 16k/year allowance with intent to buy is a better deal than financing. |
|
Appreciate
0
|
04-04-2014, 05:30 PM | #29 | ||
Brigadier General
1253
Rep 3,688
Posts
Drives: 2021 Supra 3.0 (Past: 2015 M23
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: San Francisco, CA
|
Quote:
1-Turn the keys in= you pay for overmileage fees if any+ turn in fees 2- Buy the car out= You don't pay any lease related fee's is just as if you are buying a used car 3-Extend the lease (I think the max you can extend for is 6 months) I'm inbetween leasing and BMW Select, If I lease I will get 10k miles/month and drive as much as I want since I'm buying the car out at the end This is from an old post I put up months back: Quote:
__________________
|
||
Appreciate
0
|
04-04-2014, 07:41 PM | #30 | |||
Private First Class
31
Rep 124
Posts |
Quote:
|
|||
Appreciate
0
|
04-07-2014, 04:05 PM | #32 |
Second Lieutenant
12
Rep 247
Posts |
OP
it makes no sense if you have positive equity in the lease, that you would not "sell it" and pay off the loan. Its the exact same as financing and selling at the 3 year mark. you lease residual is 37,591.50. lets say you sell it for 42,000 (not sure what you sold it for on your finance scenerio) is a 4408.5 profit. total cost of ownership on the lease is reduced to 29852.26 VERY close to financing. FK Last edited by firstkill; 04-07-2014 at 04:12 PM.. |
Appreciate
1
|
04-08-2014, 10:51 AM | #33 | |
Colonel
1586
Rep 2,148
Posts |
Quote:
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
04-08-2014, 11:04 AM | #34 |
Lieutenant Colonel
1448
Rep 1,719
Posts |
I notice you are replacing an S4 with the F80. For my next car I was contemplating an S4 because my E92 drinks gas (I drive 25-30k miles a year). Which car do you see being the better car overall. I do love my E92, but the frequent fill ups are a pain in the butt when you drive like I do. Looking for something fun, usable and somewhat reasonable on gas. It is proving to be harder than I thought. Id love to know why you are making the switch as I though the S4 to be a darn nice car. I see you love white like I do. My next ride will be white as well (my current M3 is Jerez black because I took a car that moved out of 112 status and could not modify to my traditional choice of alpine white or mineral white).
|
Appreciate
0
|
04-08-2014, 11:33 AM | #35 | |
Colonel
1586
Rep 2,148
Posts |
Quote:
The S4 with AWD and a basic Stage 1 Tune, exhaust, and intake was faster than my catless E92 up to about 100mph. The torque and power delivery is much more usable in most day-to-day driving than the E92. Without a tune though, the S4 is not very good. I wouldn't want it without one. It is more practical, you can rotate the tires, and my long-term fuel economy is 21.5mpg. The interior is world's better, and the paint is much, much better. It is also more comfortable to get in and take a long drive. All that being said, the E92 M3 is a borderline Epic car. The 911 is an Epic car. Having the M3 made me not want to drive the S4, but now having a 911 makes me not even want to sit in it. I think it is the lack of feel and experience that the car has. Being fast isn't everything. I guess I'm just really sensitive to understeer. The S4 understeers into a parking spot. I also made the mistake of getting the horrible DSG transmission. I would probably like the car more in a manual. Combine this with the fact that Audi hasn't been very pleasant from a warranty and service perspective. If you had a tuned ECU with BMW, they would probably give you a hard time if you blew up your motor and that was the cause. Audi has gone out of their way to search out and void my warranty. They also jerked me around with Audi Care. There have been a few other warranty issues with my wife's former A4. They just aren't an enthusiast friendly brand any longer. |
|
Appreciate
0
|
04-08-2014, 11:53 AM | #36 |
Lieutenant Colonel
1448
Rep 1,719
Posts |
Thanks for your input. I have memories of problems with warranty claims on VAG products in the past. BMW is better in many respects including warranty service. I would love your input once you take delivery and drive the M3. Combined 21.5 mpg on the S4 is not great unless it is all city driving.
__________________
~ 24 M4 Comp
~ Prior BMW's - Too many to list here (27) |
Appreciate
0
|
04-08-2014, 12:18 PM | #37 | |
Brigadier General
1253
Rep 3,688
Posts
Drives: 2021 Supra 3.0 (Past: 2015 M23
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: San Francisco, CA
|
Quote:
http://f80.bimmerpost.com/forums/sho...=927635&page=7
__________________
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
04-08-2014, 12:19 PM | #38 | ||
Lieutenant Colonel
1448
Rep 1,719
Posts |
Quote:
__________________
~ 24 M4 Comp
~ Prior BMW's - Too many to list here (27) |
||
Appreciate
0
|
04-08-2014, 02:11 PM | #39 | |
Colonel
1586
Rep 2,148
Posts |
Quote:
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
04-08-2014, 06:27 PM | #40 |
Lieutenant Colonel
1448
Rep 1,719
Posts |
Thanks a ton for the feedback. This is exactly the information I was looking for. Reality is that I would not buy the S4/5 knowing this. If it gets 275 a tank then that is what I get in my E92. I know your area well and I was just up there last week. Your type of driving is what I would call 70 percent highway. I'm getting 18-19 in the m3 doing 90 percent highway. Very little difference in the two. I figure your tune is costing you 2-3 mpg so best I will see is 24 mpg. The F80 is reportedly going to be mid 20's. If it is near 30 mpg then the matter is closed and my next ride will be the F80 with 6MT and 19's.
|
Appreciate
0
|
04-08-2014, 08:06 PM | #41 | |
Colonel
1586
Rep 2,148
Posts |
Quote:
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
04-09-2014, 10:49 AM | #42 |
Lieutenant Colonel
1448
Rep 1,719
Posts |
Sounds like a plan. My lease comes due April 2016 so I plan to order, if possible, a 2017 LCI M3 with competition package at that time. Even if I have to extend the E92 lease to make it work out on timing. I expect my driving level to decrease by then so I am leaning toward buying. If I am still driving like this then I will probably go with a boring 335 or something more efficient. This all depends on what kind of real world fuel economy numbers the F80 puts down. The 335 is rated at 32 highway and I know it gets about 28-30 highway max. So if they are talking high 20's for the M3 then I will expect it to be somewhere around 24-25 mpg.
|
Appreciate
0
|
04-10-2014, 09:07 AM | #44 | |
Major
287
Rep 1,449
Posts |
Quote:
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
Post Reply |
Bookmarks |
|
|