Thread: M3 vs SLR
View Single Post
      03-25-2012, 11:07 PM   #13
Onurleft
Captain
Onurleft's Avatar
50
Rep
873
Posts

Drives: RPM
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Baton Rouge and Atlanta

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by AwesomeBMW2 View Post
The sad thing is, the SLR isn't even THAT fast. I mean, I've never seen a 0-60 time faster than 3.6 or 3.7 seconds. It's quick, but it's quickest when the SLR is actually racing from a roll. The SLR is nothing a Z06 can't beat from a dig, or a ZR1 from either a dig or a roll. A GT-R would destroy it and make it look like the useless turd it was. Any modern Ferrari would embarrass the piss out of it, too. As well as any current Lambo.

Crazy that an M-DCT M3 can hit 60 mph in as little as 3.9 seconds, which is only .2-.3 tenths slower.

You couldn't be more wrong. They have run 10.80's@128's with just drag radials completely stock.
That puts it right there with
Ferrari 458
Z06
997.2 Turbo S

A 128 trap much higher then even the 13' GTR and it's a car that was developed over 10 years ago.

Not to mention it can turn despite the weight. Those things posted incredibly quick track times faster then cars like the Ford GT, F430, GT3 RS, 599. The 722 is also a nice improvement over the original model
__________________
Appreciate 0