Quote:
Originally Posted by CarJunkie
Quote:
Originally Posted by JP-1M
Yes, interesting article. I can almost forgive them for the (&(*% need to click 27 times to read it...
Quoting the article:
"E60 M5: a hit, with severe caveats
...
<snip>
|
It is annoying when they chop up an article to generate clicks for sure!
I thought it was interesting that they started out with the goal of a dichotomous choice: hit or miss. Then they couldn't help but start introducing "caveats" on several of the cars, which made it somewhat less dichotomous. |
One other review principle they didn't stick to: "Anywho, to keep things as simple as possible, we're only talking about the proper M cars. If we included M-badged cars, we'd have to go through all the skim-milk M Performance cars and every 'genuine M3' in a McDonalds car park."
And then they included tanks like the E70 X5 M...